From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: 2.6.24: (ACPI AC adapter) sending {proc,netlink,kobject}_event from -> resume method? Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 22:28:24 +0100 Message-ID: <200710302228.25650.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <200710302233.31791.arvidjaar@mail.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:42155 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753657AbXJ3VLe (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Oct 2007 17:11:34 -0400 In-Reply-To: <200710302233.31791.arvidjaar@mail.ru> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Andrey Borzenkov Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Alexey Starikovskiy On Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:33, Andrey Borzenkov wrote: > Is it valid to send events from within ->resume device method? It is or at least it should be. The GPEs are supposed to be fully functional at this point. > If not, what is the proper way to notify user space about hardware changes > during suspension? > Specifically it seems that new sysfs ACPI power supply interface sometimes > missing plugged in AC cord during suspend. I suspect that no event is > generated for this; I am not sure whether ACPI is required to generate such > events at all in this case. > > I'll need some time to get reproducible case so I do not categorize this yet > as regression. Is the "[2.6.24-rc1 regression] AC adapter state does not change after resume" message a follow-up to this one? Rafael