From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 8995] New: /proc/acpi/alarm worked; update to 2.6.22.2 and /sys/class/rtc/rtc0/wakealarm don't Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2007 20:56:55 +0100 Message-ID: <200711042056.56763.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <200709091332.44709.rjw@sisk.pl> <200711041125.35163.david-b@pacbell.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:60615 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753627AbXKDTkG (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Nov 2007 14:40:06 -0500 In-Reply-To: <200711041125.35163.david-b@pacbell.net> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: David Brownell Cc: Andrew Morton , huffcslists@gmail.com, Alessandro Zummo , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, "linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org" , bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org, Len Brown On Sunday, 4 of November 2007, David Brownell wrote: > Re http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8995 ... > > On Sunday 09 September 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > I think the suspend/hibernation code ordering changes after > > 2.6.20 are to blame here. > > So what's the status of this now ... are we back to having > the /sys/class/rtc/rtc0/wakealarm work with ACPI again, with > /sys/power/state written as "standby", "mem", or "disk" Yes, it should work now. The fix for the "disk" case is in the mainline: 9cd9a0058dd35268b24fa16795a92c800f4086d4 Author: Rafael J. Wysocki Date: Thu Oct 18 03:04:56 2007 -0700 Hibernation: Enter platform hibernation state in a consistent way.