From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Garrett Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] ACPI: WMI: Add WMI-ACPI mapper driver Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 17:55:08 +0000 Message-ID: <20071107175507.GA18433@srcf.ucam.org> References: <200711030217.40814.carlos@strangeworlds.co.uk> <20071107045421.GA8294@srcf.ucam.org> <200711071151.00852.carlos@strangeworlds.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([78.32.9.130]:42827 "EHLO vavatch.codon.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757491AbXKGRzV (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Nov 2007 12:55:21 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200711071151.00852.carlos@strangeworlds.co.uk> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Carlos Corbacho Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Len Brown , "Nashif, Anas" On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 11:51:00AM +0000, Carlos Corbacho wrote: > On Wednesday 07 November 2007 04:54:22 Matthew Garrett wrote: > 1) A method in the WMI-ACPI implementation - _some_ (very few) implementations > have a method in WMI-ACPI that will return a binary MOF (since the MS spec > suggests this is just one _possible_ way to provide the MOF, but that it is > not required). Ah, sorry, I'd misread the spec - I thought the MOF was at a defined name rather than just being returned via a normal WMI method. The functionality in this version looks fine, so I'll try to find time to test it this week. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org