From: Johannes Weiner <hannes-kernel@saeurebad.de>
To: Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
"Michael (rabenkind) Brandstetter" <listen@selfservix.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc1: OOPS at acpi_battery_update
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2007 17:58:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071108165859.GC12231@cataract> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47333ACB.6070408@suse.de>
Hi Alex,
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 07:35:23PM +0300, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >On Thursday, 8 of November 2007, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>is there any reason, why acpi_battery_get_property() should call
> >>acpi_battery_update() at all?
> >
> >Alex?
> Do you mean "why should it call _whole_ battery update?" ?
> get_state should be sufficient in order to not get stale data.
Okay, than I understood it correct.
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@saeurebad.de>
Thanks!
Hannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-08 17:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-29 10:11 2.6.24-rc1: OOPS at acpi_battery_update Romano Giannetti
2007-11-01 23:14 ` Andrew Morton
2007-11-02 16:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-11-04 9:34 ` *SPAM* " Romano Giannetti
2007-11-04 13:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-11-04 23:29 ` Michael (rabenkind) Brandstetter
2007-11-05 0:18 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-11-08 15:53 ` Johannes Weiner
2007-11-08 16:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-11-08 16:11 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2007-11-08 16:46 ` Johannes Weiner
2007-11-08 16:35 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2007-11-08 16:58 ` Johannes Weiner [this message]
2007-11-09 4:34 ` Andrew Morton
2007-11-09 9:36 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2007-11-09 9:49 ` Andrew Morton
2007-11-13 8:35 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2007-11-13 8:59 ` Andrew Morton
2007-11-13 9:23 ` [PATCH] ACPI: Battery: remove cycle from battery removal Alexey Starikovskiy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071108165859.GC12231@cataract \
--to=hannes-kernel@saeurebad.de \
--cc=astarikovskiy@suse.de \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=listen@selfservix.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).