From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5][RFC] Physical PCI slot objects
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 07:42:37 -0700
Message-ID: <20071114144237.GB7523@ldl.fc.hp.com>
References: <20071113000853.GA13341@ldl.fc.hp.com> <20071113170129.GA20185@kroah.com> <20071113183353.GE17785@parisc-linux.org> <20071113185122.GA22536@kroah.com> <20071113201102.GK17785@parisc-linux.org> <20071113230804.GA14570@us.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner+glk-linux-kernel-3=40m.gmane.org-S1759954AbXKNOmw@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20071113230804.GA14570@us.ibm.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Gary Hade <garyhade@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>, gregkh@suse.de, kristen.c.accardi@intel.com, lenb@kernel.org, rick.jones2@hp.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, pcihpd-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org

Hi Gary,

* Gary Hade <garyhade@us.ibm.com>:
> 
> I am not fundamentally opposed to this new capability but share
> the same concerns that Greg and others have expressed.  So far,
> I have only tried the changes on one single node system (IBM
> x3850) but the below NAK-worthy result supports the idea that
> the changes need to be well and widely tested.

Can you send me the lspci -vv and lspci -vt output from this
machine?

Thanks.

/ac