From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Wilcox Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5][RFC] Physical PCI slot objects Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 08:00:25 -0700 Message-ID: <20071114150025.GU17785@parisc-linux.org> References: <20071113000853.GA13341@ldl.fc.hp.com> <20071113170129.GA20185@kroah.com> <20071114141751.GS17785@parisc-linux.org> <20071114143533.GF17145@one.firstfloor.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from palinux.external.hp.com ([192.25.206.14]:48522 "EHLO mail.parisc-linux.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752767AbXKNPA1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Nov 2007 10:00:27 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071114143533.GF17145@one.firstfloor.org> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Andi Kleen Cc: Greg KH , Alex Chiang , gregkh@suse.de, kristen.c.accardi@intel.com, lenb@kernel.org, richard.jones2@hp.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, pcihpd-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 03:35:33PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > It becomes much more when someone does a find /sys. dentries are > expensive. They eventually can get pruned again, but it's still > costly to do that. Again, if this is a big concern for you, there are better places to look at for savings. -- Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step."