From: Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de>
To: LenBrown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: Linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] ACPI: EC: Workaround for optimized controllers
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 23:14:29 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071115201429.12417.39628.stgit@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
Some controllers fail to send confirmation GPE after address write.
Detect this and don't expect such confirmation in future.
This is a generalization of previous workaround
(66c5f4e7367b0085652931b2f3366de29e7ff5ec), which did only read address.
Reference: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9327
Signed-off-by: Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de>
---
drivers/acpi/ec.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/ec.c b/drivers/acpi/ec.c
index 56afe13..d6ddb54 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/ec.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/ec.c
@@ -75,7 +75,8 @@ enum {
EC_FLAGS_WAIT_GPE = 0, /* Don't check status until GPE arrives */
EC_FLAGS_QUERY_PENDING, /* Query is pending */
EC_FLAGS_GPE_MODE, /* Expect GPE to be sent for status change */
- EC_FLAGS_ONLY_IBF_GPE, /* Expect GPE only for IBF = 0 event */
+ EC_FLAGS_NO_ADDRESS_GPE, /* Expect GPE only for non-address event */
+ EC_FLAGS_ADDRESS, /* Address is being written */
};
static int acpi_ec_remove(struct acpi_device *device, int type);
@@ -166,38 +167,45 @@ static inline int acpi_ec_check_status(struct acpi_ec *ec, enum ec_event event)
static int acpi_ec_wait(struct acpi_ec *ec, enum ec_event event, int force_poll)
{
+ int ret = 0;
+ if (unlikely(test_bit(EC_FLAGS_ADDRESS, &ec->flags) &&
+ test_bit(EC_FLAGS_NO_ADDRESS_GPE, &ec->flags)))
+ force_poll = 1;
if (likely(test_bit(EC_FLAGS_GPE_MODE, &ec->flags)) &&
likely(!force_poll)) {
if (wait_event_timeout(ec->wait, acpi_ec_check_status(ec, event),
msecs_to_jiffies(ACPI_EC_DELAY)))
- return 0;
+ goto end;
clear_bit(EC_FLAGS_WAIT_GPE, &ec->flags);
if (acpi_ec_check_status(ec, event)) {
- if (event == ACPI_EC_EVENT_OBF_1) {
- /* miss OBF = 1 GPE, don't expect it anymore */
- printk(KERN_INFO PREFIX "missing OBF_1 confirmation,"
- "switching to degraded mode.\n");
- set_bit(EC_FLAGS_ONLY_IBF_GPE, &ec->flags);
+ if (test_bit(EC_FLAGS_ADDRESS, &ec->flags)) {
+ /* miss address GPE, don't expect it anymore */
+ printk(KERN_INFO PREFIX "missing address confirmation,"
+ "don't expect it any longer.\n");
+ set_bit(EC_FLAGS_NO_ADDRESS_GPE, &ec->flags);
} else {
/* missing GPEs, switch back to poll mode */
- printk(KERN_INFO PREFIX "missing IBF_1 confirmations,"
+ printk(KERN_INFO PREFIX "missing confirmations,"
"switch off interrupt mode.\n");
clear_bit(EC_FLAGS_GPE_MODE, &ec->flags);
}
- return 0;
+ goto end;
}
} else {
unsigned long delay = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(ACPI_EC_DELAY);
clear_bit(EC_FLAGS_WAIT_GPE, &ec->flags);
while (time_before(jiffies, delay)) {
if (acpi_ec_check_status(ec, event))
- return 0;
+ goto end;
}
}
printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX "acpi_ec_wait timeout,"
" status = %d, expect_event = %d\n",
acpi_ec_read_status(ec), event);
- return -ETIME;
+ ret = -ETIME;
+ end:
+ clear_bit(EC_FLAGS_ADDRESS, &ec->flags);
+ return ret;
}
static int acpi_ec_transaction_unlocked(struct acpi_ec *ec, u8 command,
@@ -216,6 +224,9 @@ static int acpi_ec_transaction_unlocked(struct acpi_ec *ec, u8 command,
"write_cmd timeout, command = %d\n", command);
goto end;
}
+ /* mark the address byte written to EC */
+ if (rdata_len + wdata_len > 1)
+ set_bit(EC_FLAGS_ADDRESS, &ec->flags);
set_bit(EC_FLAGS_WAIT_GPE, &ec->flags);
acpi_ec_write_data(ec, *(wdata++));
}
@@ -231,8 +242,6 @@ static int acpi_ec_transaction_unlocked(struct acpi_ec *ec, u8 command,
clear_bit(EC_FLAGS_QUERY_PENDING, &ec->flags);
for (; rdata_len > 0; --rdata_len) {
- if (test_bit(EC_FLAGS_ONLY_IBF_GPE, &ec->flags))
- force_poll = 1;
result = acpi_ec_wait(ec, ACPI_EC_EVENT_OBF_1, force_poll);
if (result) {
printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX "read timeout, command = %d\n",
next reply other threads:[~2007-11-15 20:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-15 20:14 Alexey Starikovskiy [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-11-18 22:37 [PATCH] ACPI: EC: Workaround for optimized controllers Alexey Starikovskiy
2007-11-19 6:11 ` Len Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071115201429.12417.39628.stgit@localhost.localdomain \
--to=astarikovskiy@suse.de \
--cc=Linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox