From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh Subject: Re: [RFC] EC registers - Adding sysfs interface? Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 21:12:37 -0200 Message-ID: <20071128231237.GC22587@khazad-dum.debian.net> References: <200711131724.31868.carlos@strangeworlds.co.uk> <200711131849.56964.carlos@strangeworlds.co.uk> <4739F2FB.9080800@suse.de> <200711131903.03018.carlos@strangeworlds.co.uk> <1196267304.23251.165.camel@queen.suse.de> <474DB282.4050003@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from out1.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:46571 "EHLO out1.smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755733AbXK1XMl (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Nov 2007 18:12:41 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <474DB282.4050003@gmail.com> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Alexey Starikovskiy Cc: trenn@suse.de, Carlos Corbacho , Alexey Starikovskiy , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Len Brown On Wed, 28 Nov 2007, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote: > Having it as /dev/ec0 should not introduce too many problems... As long as it is with a debugging intent, and not as a place to plug "userspace" drivers at. That would be much too dangerous IMO. > Also, it has much smaller impact than /dev/mem or /dev/ioport... IMHO, it is just as dangerous. -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh