From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carlos Corbacho Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] 2.6.24-rc4 hwmon it87 probe fails Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 00:45:14 +0000 Message-ID: <200712200045.16899.carlos@strangeworlds.co.uk> References: <20071204215154.7f26285e.mikeserv@bmts.com> <20071218185918.5d2d4c7d@hyperion.delvare> <200712191720.23026.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from slackadelic.com ([65.196.224.53]:60493 "EHLO mail.slackadelic.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751673AbXLTArE (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Dec 2007 19:47:04 -0500 In-Reply-To: <200712191720.23026.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Bjorn Helgaas Cc: Jean Delvare , Shaohua Li , Mike Houston , Adrian Bunk , Elvis Pranskevichus , mhoffman@lightlink.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org, Adam Belay , Zhao Yakui , Thomas Renninger , lenb@kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 20 December 2007 00:20:21 Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > I suspect the manufacturers would say "Oh, the sensors? The BIOS > isn't broken, you're just supposed to use WMI or some (undocumented) > ACPI device to get at those." It's quite possible - can we have DSDTs for the boards in question so we can quickly check if this is a possibility? (Basically, to see if they have PNP0C14 devices - if they don't, then I'm afraid it's nothing to do with WMI). -Carlos -- E-Mail: carlos@strangeworlds.co.uk Web: strangeworlds.co.uk GPG Key ID: 0x23EE722D