From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: nigel@nigel.suspend2.net
Cc: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>,
linux acpi <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
pm list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] Re: [patch] hibernation: utilize ACPI hardware signature
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 17:58:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200801031758.03056.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <477C9D51.5000604@nigel.suspend2.net>
On Thursday, 3 of January 2008, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> I suppose we can always disable this when we start to support hardware
> >> changing over hibernate (I have ideas in this direction - memory cold
> >> plugging, for a start).
> >
> > Well, if we support such features, we won't be following ACPI any more.
>
> Mmm. Apparently I'm not as focused on specs as you :).
>
> I was starting to think through whether it could make for a new and much
> faster was to boot live cds - something along the lines of complete
> redetection of hardware and memory cold plugging. Of course it's only in
> the 'I wonder if this would be possible' stage at the mo, but seemed at
> least feasible - keep the e820 tables from boot, make _init routines not
> get thrown away and do something like the kexec device shutdown etc
> around an atomic restore.
>
> I know there'd be limitations, but perhaps worth thinking about...
Well, what if the new e820 map is incompatible with the old one?
Rafael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-03 16:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-02 6:59 [patch] hibernation: utilize ACPI hardware signature Shaohua Li
2008-01-02 7:37 ` [linux-pm] " Maxim Levitsky
2008-01-02 9:29 ` Johannes Berg
2008-01-03 1:52 ` Shaohua Li
2008-01-02 10:08 ` Erik Andrén
2008-01-02 14:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-02 21:25 ` [linux-pm] " Nigel Cunningham
2008-01-02 22:18 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-03 8:26 ` Nigel Cunningham
2008-01-02 14:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-02 21:26 ` [linux-pm] " Nigel Cunningham
2008-01-02 22:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-03 8:31 ` Nigel Cunningham
2008-01-03 16:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2008-01-03 22:10 ` Nigel Cunningham
2008-01-03 5:36 ` Shaohua Li
2008-01-03 17:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-04 5:41 ` Shaohua Li
2008-01-04 20:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-07 1:46 ` Shaohua Li
2008-01-10 23:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-11 1:07 ` Shaohua Li
2008-01-11 17:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200801031758.03056.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=nigel@nigel.suspend2.net \
--cc=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox