From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Garrett Subject: Re: Asus P1-AH2 won't suspend (regression) Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 18:59:47 +0000 Message-ID: <20080105185946.GA24267@srcf.ucam.org> References: <20080104144238.GA5176@zoy.org> <200801051107.14677.carlos@strangeworlds.co.uk> <20080105145539.GE16376@zoy.org> <200801051926.33641.rjw@sisk.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([78.32.9.130]:56656 "EHLO vavatch.codon.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756127AbYAETAO (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Jan 2008 14:00:14 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200801051926.33641.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Michel Lespinasse , Carlos Corbacho , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 07:26:33PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Saturday, 5 of January 2008, Michel Lespinasse wrote: > > The patch did not work as you sent it, but doing the same in acpi_pm_open() > > (i.e. forcing it to execute the revision<3 code) worked. > > I'm now doing a happy dance :) > > > > So what now, do you need some kind of signature for the system ? > > (I realize that would probably be some kind of DMI string, > > but I'm not sure where/how to obtain it) > > Well, I think I'd rather want to introduce a boot parameter for that. Stay > tuned. Surely this implies that the only behaviour tested (and, so, presumably the only behaviour implemented in Windows) is the 1.0-style flow? If so, we should just default to that regardless of what the spec says. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org