From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Garrett Subject: Re: Asus P1-AH2 won't suspend (regression) Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 19:35:53 +0000 Message-ID: <20080105193552.GB24267@srcf.ucam.org> References: <20080104144238.GA5176@zoy.org> <200801051926.33641.rjw@sisk.pl> <20080105185946.GA24267@srcf.ucam.org> <200801052030.30862.rjw@sisk.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([78.32.9.130]:43677 "EHLO vavatch.codon.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756364AbYAETgN (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Jan 2008 14:36:13 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200801052030.30862.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Michel Lespinasse , Carlos Corbacho , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 08:30:30PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Yes, but we have quite a lot of systems working with the current code, so > I'd like to give them a chance to use the post-1.0 ordering (just in case). If the vast majority of systems have never been vendor-tested with the alternative ordering, then I don't see what it buys us. We've a demonstrable case here of it causing a regression. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org