Re: Asus P1-AH2 won't suspend (regression)

["Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>]

On Saturday, 5 of January 2008, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 07:26:33PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Saturday, 5 of January 2008, Michel Lespinasse wrote:
> > > The patch did not work as you sent it, but doing the same in acpi_pm_open()
> > > (i.e. forcing it to execute the revision<3 code) worked.
> > > I'm now doing a happy dance :)
> > > 
> > > So what now, do you need some kind of signature for the system ?
> > > (I realize that would probably be some kind of DMI string,
> > > but I'm not sure where/how to obtain it)
> > 
> > Well, I think I'd rather want to introduce a boot parameter for that.  Stay
> > tuned.
> 
> Surely this implies that the only behaviour tested (and, so, presumably 
> the only behaviour implemented in Windows) is the 1.0-style flow? If so, 
> we should just default to that regardless of what the spec says.

Yes, but we have quite a lot of systems working with the current code, so
I'd like to give them a chance to use the post-1.0 ordering (just in case).

Thanks,
Rafael