From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: Asus P1-AH2 won't suspend (regression) Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 20:30:30 +0100 Message-ID: <200801052030.30862.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <20080104144238.GA5176@zoy.org> <200801051926.33641.rjw@sisk.pl> <20080105185946.GA24267@srcf.ucam.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:57384 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756331AbYAET2K (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Jan 2008 14:28:10 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20080105185946.GA24267@srcf.ucam.org> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Matthew Garrett Cc: Michel Lespinasse , Carlos Corbacho , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Saturday, 5 of January 2008, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 07:26:33PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Saturday, 5 of January 2008, Michel Lespinasse wrote: > > > The patch did not work as you sent it, but doing the same in acpi_pm_open() > > > (i.e. forcing it to execute the revision<3 code) worked. > > > I'm now doing a happy dance :) > > > > > > So what now, do you need some kind of signature for the system ? > > > (I realize that would probably be some kind of DMI string, > > > but I'm not sure where/how to obtain it) > > > > Well, I think I'd rather want to introduce a boot parameter for that. Stay > > tuned. > > Surely this implies that the only behaviour tested (and, so, presumably > the only behaviour implemented in Windows) is the 1.0-style flow? If so, > we should just default to that regardless of what the spec says. Yes, but we have quite a lot of systems working with the current code, so I'd like to give them a chance to use the post-1.0 ordering (just in case). Thanks, Rafael