From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: [RFC][PATCH 0/7] Fix the ACPI 1.0 vs ACPI 2.0 suspend ordering issue (rev. 2) Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 23:32:43 +0100 Message-ID: <200801052332.44500.rjw@sisk.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:58232 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752694AbYAEXQP convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Jan 2008 18:16:15 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: ACPI Devel Maling List Cc: Arjan van de Ven , Carlos Corbacho , Linus Torvalds , Pavel Machek , pm list , Andrew Morton , Len Brown , Alexey Starikovskiy , "Moore, Robert" , Matthew Garrett Hi, The following patchset is intended to fix the ACPI 1.0 vs ACPI 2.0 susp= end ordering issue described at http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D= 9528 and in a recent LKML thread (http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/25/37). The patches actually do more than that, as I think it's reasonable to u= ntangle some ACPI-specific suspend code by the way. =A0The details are describe= d in the changelogs. The patches apply on top of the suspend branch of the ACPI tree (git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lenb/linux-acpi-2.6 susp= end). The previous (slightly different) iteration was tested on several syste= ms and it was confirmed that it fixed the issues at hand. Please review. Thanks, Rafael - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html