From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
Carlos Corbacho <carlos@strangeworlds.co.uk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>,
pm list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
Alexey Starikovskiy <aystarik@gmail.com>,
"Moore, Robert" <robert.moore@intel.com>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 6/7] ACPI hibernation: Call _PTS before suspending devices
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 23:56:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200801052356.41065.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200801052332.44500.rjw@sisk.pl>
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
The ACPI 1.0 specification wants us to put devices into low power
states after executing the _PTS global control methods, while ACPI
2.0 and later want us to do that in the reverse order. The current
hibernation code follows ACPI 2.0 in that respect which may cause some
ACPI 1.0x systems to hang during hibernation (ref.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9528).
Make the hibernation code execute _PTS before putting devices into
low power (ie. in accordance with ACPI 1.0x) with the possibility to
override that using the 'acpi_new_pts_ordering' kernel command line
option.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
---
drivers/acpi/sleep/main.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/sleep/main.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/acpi/sleep/main.c
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/sleep/main.c
@@ -283,22 +283,34 @@ static struct dmi_system_id __initdata a
#ifdef CONFIG_HIBERNATION
static int acpi_hibernation_open(void)
{
+ int error;
+
acpi_target_sleep_state = ACPI_STATE_S4;
- return 0;
+ if (new_pts_ordering)
+ return 0;
+
+ error = acpi_sleep_prepare(ACPI_STATE_S4);
+ if (error)
+ acpi_target_sleep_state = ACPI_STATE_S0;
+ else
+ acpi_sleep_finish_wake_up = true;
+
+ return error;
}
static int acpi_hibernation_prepare(void)
{
- int error;
-
- error = acpi_sleep_prepare(ACPI_STATE_S4);
- if (error)
- return error;
+ if (new_pts_ordering) {
+ int error = acpi_sleep_prepare(ACPI_STATE_S4);
- if (!ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_hw_disable_all_gpes()))
- error = -EFAULT;
+ if (error) {
+ acpi_target_sleep_state = ACPI_STATE_S0;
+ return error;
+ }
+ acpi_sleep_finish_wake_up = true;
+ }
- return error;
+ return ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_hw_disable_all_gpes()) ? 0 : -EFAULT;
}
static int acpi_hibernation_enter(void)
@@ -339,15 +351,17 @@ static void acpi_hibernation_finish(void
acpi_set_firmware_waking_vector((acpi_physical_address) 0);
acpi_target_sleep_state = ACPI_STATE_S0;
+ acpi_sleep_finish_wake_up = false;
}
static void acpi_hibernation_close(void)
{
/*
* This is necessary in case acpi_hibernation_finish() is not called
- * during a failing transition to the sleep state.
+ * directly during a failing transition to the sleep state.
*/
- acpi_target_sleep_state = ACPI_STATE_S0;
+ if (acpi_sleep_finish_wake_up)
+ acpi_hibernation_finish();
}
static int acpi_hibernation_pre_restore(void)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-05 23:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-05 22:32 [RFC][PATCH 0/7] Fix the ACPI 1.0 vs ACPI 2.0 suspend ordering issue (rev. 2) Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-05 22:38 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/7] Suspend: Introduce open() and close() callbacks Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-06 0:31 ` David Brownell
2008-01-06 13:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-05 22:41 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/7] ACPI: Separate invocations of _GTS and _BFS from _PTS and _WAK Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-07 21:25 ` Len Brown
2008-01-07 21:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-05 22:42 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/7] ACPI: Separate disabling of GPEs from _PTS Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-05 22:48 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/7] ACPI Suspend: Call _PTS before suspending devices Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-05 22:50 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/7] Hibernation: Introduce open() and close() callbacks Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-05 22:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2008-01-05 22:58 ` [RFC][PATCH 7/7] ACPI: Print message before calling _PTS Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200801052356.41065.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=aystarik@gmail.com \
--cc=carlos@strangeworlds.co.uk \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
--cc=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=robert.moore@intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox