From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michel Lespinasse Subject: Re: Asus P1-AH2 won't suspend (regression) Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 21:51:41 -0800 Message-ID: <20080106055141.GA20938@zoy.org> References: <20080104144238.GA5176@zoy.org> <200801051926.33641.rjw@sisk.pl> <20080105185946.GA24267@srcf.ucam.org> <200801052030.30862.rjw@sisk.pl> <20080105193552.GB24267@srcf.ucam.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from server.lespinasse.org ([64.142.28.226]:33539 "EHLO server.lespinasse.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750792AbYAFFvm (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Jan 2008 00:51:42 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080105193552.GB24267@srcf.ucam.org> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Matthew Garrett Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Carlos Corbacho , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 07:35:53PM +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 08:30:30PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > Yes, but we have quite a lot of systems working with the current code, so > > I'd like to give them a chance to use the post-1.0 ordering (just in case). > > If the vast majority of systems have never been vendor-tested with the > alternative ordering, then I don't see what it buys us. We've a > demonstrable case here of it causing a regression. I think having a runtime (or config) option will be great. As to what the default should be, I don't have a strong opinion but I must caution that a lot of people have reported issues with suspend/resume on this hardware, including some that mention running windows, so I'm worried about making a decision based only on this hardware - it looks like it's not been tested much on windows either :/ As an example of many other people complaining about suspend I can cite: http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductReview.aspx?Item=N82E16856110057 -- Michel Lespinasse