From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: USB D3 vs system S3 Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 22:09:10 +0100 Message-ID: <200801082209.11506.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <200801081547.00473.lenb@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:43347 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751811AbYAHVGu (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jan 2008 16:06:50 -0500 In-Reply-To: <200801081547.00473.lenb@kernel.org> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Len Brown Cc: Alan Stern , David Brownell , gregkh@suse.de, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Linux-pm mailing list , USB development list On Tuesday, 8 of January 2008, Len Brown wrote: > FYI, > I think we may have an issue here where the entire Linux suspend order > is being proposed to change, when in fact the underlying issue > may really be that USB is in D3 on S3 for this box when it is > not supposed to be deeper below D1. > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9528 Bug #9528 is not the only test case, though. Please have a look at this thread: http://marc.info/?t=119945995300002&r=1&w=2 Thanks, Rafael