From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Carlos Corbacho <carlos@strangeworlds.co.uk>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
gregkh@suse.de, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
Linux-pm mailing list <linux-pm@lists.osdl.org>,
USB development list <linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: USB D3 vs system S3
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 13:03:23 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200801091303.23426.david-b@pacbell.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0801091213250.2880-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
On Wednesday 09 January 2008, Alan Stern wrote:
>
> > > The USB autosuspend code affects only the controller's USB interface --
> > > it doesn't touch the PCI side. An autosuspended controller will remain
> > > in D0. Until somebody tries writing autosuspend code for PCI
> > > devices...
> >
> > Is this likely to happen?
>
> I don't know of anybody working on it. A minimal prerequisite is that
> PCI runtime wakeup processing needs to work right -- which it doesn't.
> See
>
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6892
And while most of the non-PCI USB host platforms to which I have access
don't have that type of issue, their hardware isn't actually set up to
offer an analogue of runtime PCI_D3 (for example) power states.
In more detail: they generally have some clocks that could be disabled,
but for various reasons they need to be left running. Disabling those
clocks prevents wakeup from working ... yes, a multi-MHz clock just to
detect the D+ (or D-) pullup as it kicks in. Systems using an external
PHY will sometimes offer an alternative, when the PHY can issue those
wakeup IRQs by itself, but that seems oddly uncommon.
- Dave
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-09 21:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-08 20:47 USB D3 vs system S3 Len Brown
2008-01-08 21:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-01-08 21:55 ` David Brownell
2008-01-09 0:09 ` Carlos Corbacho
2008-01-09 12:51 ` Carlos Corbacho
2008-01-09 16:07 ` Alan Stern
2008-01-09 16:38 ` Carlos Corbacho
2008-01-09 17:16 ` Alan Stern
2008-01-09 21:03 ` David Brownell [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200801091303.23426.david-b@pacbell.net \
--to=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=carlos@strangeworlds.co.uk \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox