From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] PM: Do not destroy/create devices while suspended (rev. 2) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 12:25:43 +0100 Message-ID: <200801121225.44688.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <20080112005619.GA4665@suse.de> <20080112042946.GA30093@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:33066 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754804AbYALLW7 (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Jan 2008 06:22:59 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20080112042946.GA30093@suse.de> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Greg KH Cc: Alan Stern , Andrew Morton , linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, lenb@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pavel@suse.cz, mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de, ak@suse.de On Saturday, 12 of January 2008, Greg KH wrote: > On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 10:11:52PM -0500, Alan Stern wrote: > > On Fri, 11 Jan 2008, Greg KH wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 04:49:04PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > > > err, no. pm-introduce-destroy_suspended_device.patch demolishes > > > > pm-acquire-device-locks-on-suspend-rev-3.patch > > > > > > > > Confused, giving up. > > > > > > I'm confused too, I have no idea what the proper order of things should > > > be either. Anyone want to give me a hint? > > > > Sorry for the confusion. The correct patch to apply is > > pm-acquire-device-locks-on-suspend-rev-3 (plus the attending > > style-fixups). It encompasses those earlier patches. > > Can someone resend this to me? Do I need to drop the patch I currently > have in my tree as well? Or put it before/after that one? > > > The real problem is that our current email workflow patterns don't > > provide a standardized way for maintainers to tell when a new patch > > submission is meant to override or replace an earlier submission (or > > even a set of earlier submissions). Does anybody have some suggestions > > for a good way to do this? > > Yeah, just tell me what you want me to do with it (drop an old one, > replace it, add it, etc.) We usually can handle this pretty well :) I'll repost the new patch along with instructions what to do with it. Greetings, Rafael