From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
pm list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Need to replace one patch in suspend branch
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 11:57:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200802011157.02347.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200801312322.09211.lenb@kernel.org>
On Friday, 1 of February 2008, Len Brown wrote:
> On Monday 28 January 2008 18:29, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Hi Len,
> >
> > Would it be possible to replace commit a04ca6718960e842624833a01dbd5f10f38f5af1
> > "Suspend: Testing facility (rev. 2)" in the suspend branch with the appended patch?
> >
> > Unfortunately, the original commit uses pointers to 'struct kset' which is no
> > longer valid after the recently merged driver core changes.
>
> Hi Rafael,
> The original suspend branch is now available rooted at 2.6.24
> as "suspend-2.6.24".
>
> The latest "suspend" branch is now based on today's linus HEAD.
Thanks a lot for doing that!
> In the suspend branch, I rewound the series until after the
> original patch, patch -R the original, patch -N the new one,
> and checked in the the resulting diff (below).
>
> At the expense of the additional trivial patch,
> this struck me as a good balance between preserving
> the (tested) history, showing what changed,
> and minimizing exposure to bisect build breakage.
Yes, this is a good idea to add this additional patch after the original one.
Thanks,
Rafael
> commit 21779c8de31b1c9e749af676a033109f70156678
> Author: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
> Date: Tue Jan 29 00:29:06 2008 +0100
>
> suspend: build fix responding to 2.6.25 kset change
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
>
> diff --git a/kernel/power/main.c b/kernel/power/main.c
> index 84e1ae6..fc717b8 100644
> --- a/kernel/power/main.c
> +++ b/kernel/power/main.c
> @@ -53,7 +53,8 @@ static const char * const pm_tests[__TEST_AFTER_LAST] = {
> [TEST_FREEZER] = "freezer",
> };
>
> -static ssize_t pm_test_show(struct kset *kset, char *buf)
> +static ssize_t pm_test_show(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr,
> + char *buf)
> {
> char *s = buf;
> int level;
> @@ -73,7 +74,8 @@ static ssize_t pm_test_show(struct kset *kset, char *buf)
> return (s - buf);
> }
>
> -static ssize_t pm_test_store(struct kset *kset, const char *buf, size_t n)
> +static ssize_t pm_test_store(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr,
> + const char *buf, size_t n)
> {
> const char * const *s;
> int level;
> @@ -104,6 +106,7 @@ power_attr(pm_test);
> static inline int suspend_test(int level) { return 0; }
> #endif /* !CONFIG_PM_DEBUG */
>
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_SUSPEND
>
> /* This is just an arbitrary number */
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-01 10:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-28 23:29 Need to replace one patch in suspend branch Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-02-01 4:22 ` Len Brown
2008-02-01 10:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200802011157.02347.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox