From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Garrett Subject: Re: [PATCH] Ignore ACPI video devices that aren't present in hardware Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 00:03:55 +0000 Message-ID: <20080203000354.GA26623@srcf.ucam.org> References: <1197032113.28990.155.camel@queen.suse.de> <200801241721.17436.lenb@kernel.org> <20080127020920.GB10173@srcf.ucam.org> <200802020212.17812.lenb@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([78.32.9.130]:60092 "EHLO vavatch.codon.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1765998AbYBCAEM (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Feb 2008 19:04:12 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200802020212.17812.lenb@kernel.org> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Len Brown Cc: Thomas Renninger , linux-acpi , Andrew Morton , "Li, Shaohua" On Sat, Feb 02, 2008 at 02:12:17AM -0500, Len Brown wrote: > But I have to agree with Thomas' feedback: > "I also wonder why you added this to acpi_video_bus_add_fs and not > acpi_video_bus_add, but it's functionally the same." > > or perhaps acpi_video_bus_check()? Yeah, that's fair enough. I'll respin it once I'm on the ground for more than 3 hours. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org