From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: [PATCH for review] ACPI: Create /sys/firmware/acpi/interrupts/ counters Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 22:49:09 -0800 Message-ID: <20080206064909.GA14996@suse.de> References: <200802050230.10873.lenb@kernel.org> <200802052058.50663.lenb@kernel.org> <20080206024349.GA10883@suse.de> <200802060133.25863.lenb@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:59168 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750990AbYBFGpW (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Feb 2008 01:45:22 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200802060133.25863.lenb@kernel.org> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Len Brown Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 01:33:25AM -0500, Len Brown wrote: > Thanks for the reply, Greg. > > If these counters are not always available by default, then > I've lost most of their value for supporting systems in the field. > > Plus, I think I can live with just the individual sysfs files, > given Bjorn's "grep . *" tip. > > So if I follow the rules, do you think it is okay to put > these stats in sysfs? In the hopes the answer is "yes", > I'll reply with a refreshed patch Sure, one value per file is fine. I'll be glad to review a patch like that, with a Documentation/ABI/ entry :) thanks, greg k-h