From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: matthieu castet <castet.matthieu@free.fr>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
pm list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: suspend to ram problem
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 00:03:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200802070003.05543.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080206224308.GA1630@elf.ucw.cz>
On Wednesday, 6 of February 2008, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> >>>>>> instead of existing stack setup. That helped on one of my test-boxes
> >>>>> Thanks, I will try that.
> >>>>> Because clearing the flags imply pop/push in the stack it could be the
> >>>>> problem
> >>>> That doesn't help : it still crash in pushl $0.
> >>>>
> >>> All stack stuff in wakeup_code crash for me.
> >>> I tried to change the stack position, make sure upper bit of %esp are
> >>> clear, ... nothing work.
> >>> What's are strange is that according to my x86 manual, in real mode the
> >>> failure can only happen if the stack wrap which is not the case here.
> >>> Any x86 guru advice ?
> >>>
> >>> If I remove stack access (remove clearing flag stuff, not call to video
> >>> stuff) the resume works.
> >>
> >> Hm, can you place a "pushl %eax; popl %eax;" in place of the removed code and
> >> see if that breaks?
> > Yes that also break.
Interesting.
> Not sure what is going on...
Looks like ss goes bonkers or the 32-bit opcodes are invalid in real mode.
Matthieu, can you try "pushw %ax; popw %ax;", please?
Rafael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-06 23:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-03 13:37 suspend to ram problem matthieu castet
2008-02-03 15:31 ` matthieu castet
2008-02-03 17:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-02-03 18:18 ` Pavel Machek
2008-02-03 18:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-02-03 18:40 ` matthieu castet
2008-02-04 6:57 ` matthieu castet
2008-02-05 23:02 ` matthieu castet
2008-02-05 23:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-02-06 22:40 ` matthieu castet
2008-02-06 22:43 ` Pavel Machek
2008-02-06 23:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2008-02-07 20:12 ` Cacy Rodney
2008-02-06 22:43 ` Pavel Machek
2008-02-06 23:17 ` matthieu castet
2008-02-07 9:20 ` Pavel Machek
2008-02-07 19:49 ` matthieu castet
2008-02-07 20:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-02-08 22:10 ` Pavel Machek
2008-02-07 9:23 ` Pavel Machek
2008-02-07 18:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200802070003.05543.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=castet.matthieu@free.fr \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox