From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Len Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH 111/112] Revert "cpuidle: build fix for non-x86" Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 13:47:46 -0500 Message-ID: <200802071347.47101.lenb@kernel.org> References: <4169c45f179e285feac6bcf25f4bd0db6b109bab.1202376823.git.len.brown@intel.com> <9b7131542178f5f948e4bb6bea6e1c545e697b06.1202376825.git.len.brown@intel.com> <20080207102728.GC16735@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from hera.kernel.org ([140.211.167.34]:58640 "EHLO hera.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751154AbYBGSsK (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Feb 2008 13:48:10 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20080207102728.GC16735@elte.hu> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Ingo Molnar Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 07 February 2008 05:27, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Len Brown wrote: > > > From: Len Brown > > > > This reverts commit f757397097d0713c949af76dccabb65a2785782e. > > which ironically broke the ia64 build > > hm, this seems to be an internal ACPI commit - why not eliminate both > commits (the broken one and the revert one) and thus fix that window of > non-bisectability, before pushing this upstream? i agree, and this bothered me too. Dunno if I have time to undo and re-merge my tree before Linus pulls and/or declares rc1... -Len