From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Garrett Subject: Re: [PATCH 053/112] the generic thermal sysfs driver Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 21:48:33 +0000 Message-ID: <20080207214833.GA4682@srcf.ucam.org> References: <4169c45f179e285feac6bcf25f4bd0db6b109bab.1202376823.git.len.brown@intel.com> <203d3d4aa482339b4816f131f713e1b8ee37f6dd.1202376824.git.len.brown@intel.com> <20080207200900.GA2082@srcf.ucam.org> <200802071638.43935.lenb@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([78.32.9.130]:55249 "EHLO vavatch.codon.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758654AbYBGVss (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Feb 2008 16:48:48 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200802071638.43935.lenb@kernel.org> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Len Brown Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Zhang Rui , Thomas Sujith On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 04:38:43PM -0500, Len Brown wrote: > On Thursday 07 February 2008 15:09, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > There's still ongoing discussion about what the interface should look > > like (and I certainly agree that the difference in units between this > > class and hwmon should be a showstopper) - can we skip pushing this > > until those are resolved? > > It is upstream now. > > I'm hopeful that getting into -rc1 will poke us to get > these issues resolved sooner than if we had kept the > series out of tree. I'm also hopeful that we'll have > no major issues with it by 2.6.25.final. Given that it'll end up defining ABI, if it's not sorted by final then we'll really need to pull it. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org