* Re: linux-next: first tree [not found] <20080215003537.8911ce35.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> @ 2008-02-14 14:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-02-14 15:00 ` Stephen Rothwell 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-02-14 14:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stephen Rothwell; +Cc: linux-next, LKML, ACPI Devel Maling List, Len Brown On Thursday, 14 of February 2008, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > I have created the first cut of the linux-next tree at > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sfr/linux-next.git. > > Things to know about this tree: > > It has two branches - master and stable. Stable is currently just Linus' > tree and will never rebase. Master will rebase on an almost daily basis > (maybe slower at the start). > > The tree consists of subsystem git and quilt trees. Currently, the quilt > trees are integrated by importing them into appropriately based git > branches and then merging those branches. This has the advantage that > any conflict resolution will onlt have to happen once at the merge point > rather than, possibly, sevveral times during the series. However, I am > considering just applying the quilt trees on top of the current tree > to get a result more like Linus' tree - we will see. The git trees are > obviously just merged. > > Between each merge, the tree was built with both an allmodconfig for both > powerpc and x86_64. > > The tree currently contains: > Greg's driver-core, pci and usb quilt series (in that order) > Alasdair Kergon's device-mapper quilt tree > Jiri Kosina's hid git tree > Jean Delvare's i2c quilt tree > Randy Dunlap's kernel-doc quilt tree > Haavard Skinnemoen's avr32 git tree > > There was only one unresolved conflict which could have been caused > because I was not sure where to base the kernel-doc tree. > > So, comments, please. > > Also, more trees please ... :-) Perhaps you can add: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lenb/linux-acpi-2.6 test Thanks, Rafael ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: first tree 2008-02-14 14:45 ` linux-next: first tree Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-02-14 15:00 ` Stephen Rothwell 2008-02-14 15:25 ` Martin Schwidefsky ` (2 more replies) 0 siblings, 3 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2008-02-14 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: linux-next, LKML, ACPI Devel Maling List, Len Brown [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 554 bytes --] Hi Rafael, On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:45:55 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote: > > Perhaps you can add: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lenb/linux-acpi-2.6 test I would prefer that the trees be added by the subsystem maintainers and they can tell me which branch represents their expectations for the next kernel release (in this case 2.6.26). But thanks, hopefully you will have prodded them along. :-) -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ [-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: first tree 2008-02-14 15:00 ` Stephen Rothwell @ 2008-02-14 15:25 ` Martin Schwidefsky 2008-02-14 21:48 ` Stephen Rothwell 2008-02-14 15:49 ` Paul Mundt 2008-02-15 4:58 ` Len Brown 2 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Martin Schwidefsky @ 2008-02-14 15:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, linux-next, LKML, ACPI Devel Maling List, Len Brown On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 02:00 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > I would prefer that the trees be added by the subsystem maintainers and > they can tell me which branch represents their expectations for the next > kernel release (in this case 2.6.26). But thanks, hopefully you will have > prodded them along. :-) For the s390 architecture please use the "features" branch of git390: git://git390.osdl.marist.edu/pub/scm/linux-2.6.git features -- blue skies, Martin. "Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: first tree 2008-02-14 15:25 ` Martin Schwidefsky @ 2008-02-14 21:48 ` Stephen Rothwell 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2008-02-14 21:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: schwidefsky Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, linux-next, LKML, ACPI Devel Maling List, Len Brown [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 370 bytes --] Hi Martin, On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 16:25:09 +0100 Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> wrote: > > For the s390 architecture please use the "features" branch of git390: > > git://git390.osdl.marist.edu/pub/scm/linux-2.6.git features Added thanks. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ [-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: first tree 2008-02-14 15:00 ` Stephen Rothwell 2008-02-14 15:25 ` Martin Schwidefsky @ 2008-02-14 15:49 ` Paul Mundt 2008-02-14 21:58 ` Stephen Rothwell 2008-02-15 4:58 ` Len Brown 2 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Paul Mundt @ 2008-02-14 15:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, linux-next, LKML, ACPI Devel Maling List, Len Brown On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 02:00:19AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Rafael, > > On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:45:55 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote: > > > > Perhaps you can add: > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lenb/linux-acpi-2.6 test > > I would prefer that the trees be added by the subsystem maintainers and > they can tell me which branch represents their expectations for the next > kernel release (in this case 2.6.26). But thanks, hopefully you will have > prodded them along. :-) > For SH: master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lethal/sh-2.6.git This is also what goes in to -mm. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: first tree 2008-02-14 15:49 ` Paul Mundt @ 2008-02-14 21:58 ` Stephen Rothwell 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2008-02-14 21:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Paul Mundt Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, linux-next, LKML, ACPI Devel Maling List, Len Brown [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 299 bytes --] Hi Paul, On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 00:49:28 +0900 Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org> wrote: > > For SH: > > master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lethal/sh-2.6.git Added, thanks. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ [-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: first tree 2008-02-14 15:00 ` Stephen Rothwell 2008-02-14 15:25 ` Martin Schwidefsky 2008-02-14 15:49 ` Paul Mundt @ 2008-02-15 4:58 ` Len Brown 2008-02-15 6:19 ` Stephen Rothwell 2 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Len Brown @ 2008-02-15 4:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, linux-next, LKML, ACPI Devel Maling List On Thursday 14 February 2008 10:00, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Rafael, > > On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:45:55 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote: > > > > Perhaps you can add: > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lenb/linux-acpi-2.6 test > > I would prefer that the trees be added by the subsystem maintainers and > they can tell me which branch represents their expectations for the next > kernel release (in this case 2.6.26). But thanks, hopefully you will have > prodded them along. :-) Rafael has it right, please add the branch above. It will include both the upcoming ACPI and suspend patches. Note that I reserve the right to re-base it from time to time - so when you pull it, you want to pull it onto a new branch vs. Linux rather than onto a previous copy of itself. thanks, -Len ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: first tree 2008-02-15 4:58 ` Len Brown @ 2008-02-15 6:19 ` Stephen Rothwell 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2008-02-15 6:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Len Brown; +Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, linux-next, LKML, ACPI Devel Maling List [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 572 bytes --] Hi Len, On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 23:58:38 -0500 Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> wrote: > > Rafael has it right, please add the branch above. > It will include both the upcoming ACPI and suspend patches. Added, thanks, with you as contact. > Note that I reserve the right to re-base it from time to time - > so when you pull it, you want to pull it onto a new branch vs. Linux > rather than onto a previous copy of itself. That is fine, I expect rebases. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ [-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-02-15 6:19 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20080215003537.8911ce35.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
2008-02-14 14:45 ` linux-next: first tree Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-02-14 15:00 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-02-14 15:25 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2008-02-14 21:48 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-02-14 15:49 ` Paul Mundt
2008-02-14 21:58 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-02-15 4:58 ` Len Brown
2008-02-15 6:19 ` Stephen Rothwell
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox