From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lukas Hejtmanek Subject: Re: 2.6.25-rc1 regression - IBM ACPI backlight Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 13:53:19 +0100 Message-ID: <20080215125318.GC4269@ics.muni.cz> References: <20080214103801.GB4366@ics.muni.cz> <20080214122452.GB12775@khazad-dum.debian.net> <20080215110213.GA5648@ics.muni.cz> <20080215120720.GA31578@srcf.ucam.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from minas.ics.muni.cz ([147.251.4.40]:36767 "EHLO minas.ics.muni.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754802AbYBOMxY (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Feb 2008 07:53:24 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080215120720.GA31578@srcf.ucam.org> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Matthew Garrett Cc: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 12:07:20PM +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 12:02:13PM +0100, Lukas Hejtmanek wrote: > > 2.6.24 kernel has two acpi_video[01]. 2.6.25-rc1 does not, it conta= ins only > > acpi_video0 (even in text mode in single user without X being loade= d) which > > does not work at all. >=20 > Sigh. Ok. Could you attach the output of acpidump and lspci, please?=20 > I'll try to figure out why this is wrong. I created a bug report here including acpidump and lspci: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D9995 --=20 Luk=E1=B9 Hejtm=E1nek - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html