From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: 100% C0 with 2.6.25-rc Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 17:33:53 +0100 Message-ID: <200802211733.54759.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <47BD600F.9090502@willies.info> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:37323 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759695AbYBUQfR convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Feb 2008 11:35:17 -0500 In-Reply-To: <47BD600F.9090502@willies.info> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Jan Willies Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , LKML , Thomas Gleixner , Venki Pallipadi On Thursday, 21 of February 2008, Jan Willies wrote: > Hi, >=20 > Since 2.6.25-rc1 I have a lot of wakeups/s (=E2=89=88134191,4) and sp= end 100% in C0. > It worked fine with 2.6.24 and commandline nolapic. Without nolapic I= had 80k > wakeups/s after some time, but not right from the start like now. =20 We have a regression from 2.6.24, apparently interrupts-related. > What useful information can I provide? Let's see what the experts say. Thanks, Rafael - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html