From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Garrett Subject: Re: Kernel Version specific vendor override possibilities needed - Revert and provide osi=linux or provide a replacement Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 16:31:15 +0000 Message-ID: <20080226163115.GB12020@srcf.ucam.org> References: <1203471860.3358.177.camel@linux-2bdv.site> <20080220173248.GA22709@srcf.ucam.org> <20080220182339.GC17648@khazad-dum.debian.net> <20080220184954.GB23679@srcf.ucam.org> <20080221031324.GB6344@khazad-dum.debian.net> <20080221091532.GA3091@srcf.ucam.org> <20080221135132.GE14614@mit.edu> <1204043205.4995.228.camel@queen.suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([78.32.9.130]:51720 "EHLO vavatch.codon.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751490AbYBZQbp (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Feb 2008 11:31:45 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1204043205.4995.228.camel@queen.suse.de> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Thomas Renninger Cc: Theodore Tso , Henrique de Moraes Holschuh , Len Brown , linux-acpi , "Starikovskiy, Alexey Y" On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 05:26:45PM +0100, Thomas Renninger wrote: > Return true for OSI("Linux") for some T61 is wrong. I agree, and I'd rather not have the whitelisting. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org