From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Wilcox Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] ACPI PCI slot detection driver Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 13:34:42 -0700 Message-ID: <20080305203441.GP24386@parisc-linux.org> References: <20080229002341.GA21420@ldl.fc.hp.com> <20080301144307.GD24386@parisc-linux.org> <20080304054927.GA15566@suse.de> <200803041018.29035.jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> <20080304193036.GB5534@suse.de> <20080304230937.GD3694@ldl.fc.hp.com> <47CDF339.3060304@jp.fujitsu.com> <20080305202052.GN3694@ldl.fc.hp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from palinux.external.hp.com ([192.25.206.14]:53443 "EHLO mail.parisc-linux.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753720AbYCEUfD (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Mar 2008 15:35:03 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080305202052.GN3694@ldl.fc.hp.com> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Alex Chiang , Kenji Kaneshige , Greg KH , Jesse Barnes , Gary Hade , wa On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 01:20:52PM -0700, Alex Chiang wrote: > So given that it's two versus one, I modified my > drivers/acpi/pci_slot module to consider Fujitsu machines to be a > quirk. :) > > Can you please test patches 1 and 2 that I sent out as v8 of my > series, but replace patch 3 with this patch? I like this idea. Nicely done. -- Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step."