From: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
To: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede@hhs.nl>,
"Zhang, Rui" <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
linux-acpi <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
lm-sensors <lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>,
Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>,
"Thomas, Sujith" <sujith.thomas@intel.com>,
"Mark M. Hoffman" <mhoffman@lightlink.com>,
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>,
Richard Hughes <hughsient@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] thermal: add hwmon sys I/F for thermal device
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 10:44:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080318104428.5c9d4996@hyperion.delvare> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200803180112.58655.lenb@kernel.org>
On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 01:12:58 -0400, Len Brown wrote:
> While ACPI is currently the only customer of the generic thermal I/F,
> there is a future platform in the pipeline that has no ACPI
> and it too will use the generic thermal I/F.
A future platform that has no ACPI? Yeeehoooo! :)
(Sorry couldn't resist.)
> > (...)
> > Rui, Len, how did you originally envision the coexistence (or not) of
> > different types of thermal zones?
>
> Right now we seem to be ACPI and then non-ACPI on different systems.
> However, I don't see any reason that both can't be on the same system.
OK, in this case this confirms that the current model (all thermal
zones in one hwmon device) is not correct.
--
Jean Delvare
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-18 9:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-25 21:31 [PATCH 1/2] thermal: add hwmon sys I/F for thermal device Zhang, Rui
2008-02-26 8:39 ` Hans de Goede
2008-02-26 21:40 ` Zhang, Rui
2008-02-27 8:32 ` Hans de Goede
2008-03-17 12:37 ` Jean Delvare
2008-03-17 12:55 ` Hans de Goede
2008-03-17 13:48 ` Jean Delvare
2008-03-18 3:45 ` Zhang, Rui
2008-03-18 10:06 ` Jean Delvare
2008-03-20 14:58 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-03-18 5:12 ` Len Brown
2008-03-18 9:44 ` Jean Delvare [this message]
2008-03-18 3:11 ` Zhang, Rui
2008-03-18 1:59 ` Zhang, Rui
2008-03-18 9:25 ` Hans de Goede
2008-03-18 9:40 ` Jean Delvare
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-02-27 0:37 Zhang, Rui
2008-03-12 4:29 ` Len Brown
2008-03-13 5:09 ` Len Brown
2008-03-13 8:46 ` Zhang, Rui
2008-03-18 4:59 ` Len Brown
2008-03-13 10:59 ` Thomas Renninger
2008-03-13 23:09 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-03-14 9:03 ` Thomas Renninger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080318104428.5c9d4996@hyperion.delvare \
--to=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=hmh@hmh.eng.br \
--cc=hughsient@gmail.com \
--cc=j.w.r.degoede@hhs.nl \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org \
--cc=mhoffman@lightlink.com \
--cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=sujith.thomas@intel.com \
--cc=trenn@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox