From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [patch 2.6.25-rc6 3/7] pci_choose_state() cleanup and fixes
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 17:23:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200803211723.17685.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200803210115.04210.david-b@pacbell.net>
On Friday, 21 of March 2008, David Brownell wrote:
> On Thursday 20 March 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Is there any reason why pci_choose_state() should try to figure out what kind
> > of operation is being performed by the driver and tailor its output to that?
>
> It's always been specified to do that ... but it's always done
> that in a buggy way. (Which is why USB never used it.)
I hope you realize that your change will affect all drivers calling
pci_choose_state() on ACPI systems on FREEZE/PRETHAW in a hard to predict
way? Perhaps some of them actually rely on getting D3hot on FREEZE, for
example?
> > I don't think so. Rather, the driver should know what it's doing and either
> > call pci_choose_state() or not. If the state of the device is not to be
> > changed, there's no reason to call pci_choose_state() at all.
>
> You seem to object to letting drivers offload this particular
> bit of work to infrastructure.
No, I don't. I just don't think it's a good idea to change the existing and
widely used function for this purpose. If I needed some specific functionality
at the infrastructure level, I'd add a new function for that with a new
changelog etc. Then, made drivers switch to that and remove the old one.
> What's the dividing line between being OK to offload vs not eing OK? Why not
> let the drivers make that choice?
>
>
> > [Note that with the new suspend/hibernation callbacks there
> > won't be the pm_message_t argument to pass to pci_choose_state().]
>
> The pm_message_t will necessarily linger until all drivers have
> been converted and re-tested. Which can't be an overnight thing.
No, it can't. Still, suppose a driver is using the new callbacks. How is it
supposed to use pci_choose_state()?
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-21 16:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-20 21:08 [patch 2.6.25-rc6 0/7] misc pm wake patches David Brownell
2008-03-20 21:09 ` [patch 2.6.25-rc6 1/7] crosslink ACPI and "real" device nodes David Brownell
2008-03-21 6:43 ` Zhao Yakui
2008-03-21 7:31 ` David Brownell
2008-03-21 8:34 ` Zhao Yakui
2008-03-21 9:04 ` David Brownell
2008-03-20 21:10 ` [patch 2.6.25-rc6 2/7] acpi_pm_device_sleep_state() cleanup David Brownell
2008-03-24 16:30 ` [linux-pm] " Pavel Machek
2008-04-19 4:11 ` [RESEND patch 2.6.25] " David Brownell
2008-04-29 20:33 ` [RE-RESEND patch 2.6.25-git] " David Brownell
2008-04-29 21:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-04-29 22:12 ` David Brownell
2008-04-30 12:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-03-20 21:12 ` [patch 2.6.25-rc6 3/7] pci_choose_state() cleanup and fixes David Brownell
2008-03-20 22:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-03-20 23:03 ` David Brownell
2008-03-21 0:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-03-21 0:55 ` [linux-pm] " Alan Stern
2008-03-21 1:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-03-21 8:15 ` David Brownell
2008-03-21 16:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2008-03-22 17:55 ` David Brownell
2008-03-22 18:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-03-22 18:29 ` David Brownell
2008-03-21 7:53 ` David Brownell
2008-03-21 16:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-03-22 17:49 ` David Brownell
2008-03-22 18:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-04-14 4:59 ` David Brownell
2008-03-20 21:15 ` [patch 2.6.25-rc6 4/7] USB uses pci_choose_state() David Brownell
2008-03-20 21:20 ` [patch 2.6.25-rc6 5/7] ACPI sets up device.power.can_wakeup flags David Brownell
2008-03-21 7:43 ` Zhao Yakui
2008-04-19 4:14 ` [RESEND patch 2.6.25] " David Brownell
2008-04-22 2:48 ` Zhang Rui
2008-03-20 21:22 ` [patch 2.6.25-rc6 6/7] ACPI uses device_may_wakeup() policy inputs David Brownell
2008-04-19 4:18 ` [RESEND patch 2.6.25] " David Brownell
2008-04-22 2:42 ` Zhang Rui
2008-04-26 19:29 ` David Brownell
2008-04-22 13:30 ` Zhao Yakui
2008-04-26 19:37 ` David Brownell
2008-04-28 12:48 ` Zhao Yakui
2008-04-28 8:50 ` Zhang Rui
2008-04-28 13:43 ` [linux-pm] " Alan Stern
2008-04-29 23:38 ` David Brownell
2008-04-30 13:58 ` Alan Stern
2008-05-14 14:56 ` Pavel Machek
2008-04-28 22:28 ` David Brownell
2008-04-28 21:35 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-04-28 22:20 ` David Brownell
2008-04-28 22:54 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-04-29 0:20 ` David Brownell
2008-04-29 20:32 ` David Brownell
2008-04-28 22:24 ` David Brownell
2008-04-28 22:26 ` David Brownell
2008-03-20 21:25 ` [patch 2.6.25-rc6 7/7] PCI set up device.power.can_wakeup flags David Brownell
2008-03-20 21:53 ` [linux-pm] " Alan Stern
2008-03-20 22:22 ` David Brownell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200803211723.17685.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox