From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Wilcox Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/16] PCI slot: Remove unused slot member from pci_dev (Not for mainline!) Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 13:30:09 -0600 Message-ID: <20080321193009.GI424@parisc-linux.org> References: <20080318210539.GA30421@ldl.fc.hp.com> <47E33472.1000602@jp.fujitsu.com> <47E33693.7080102@jp.fujitsu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from palinux.external.hp.com ([192.25.206.14]:47916 "EHLO mail.parisc-linux.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751078AbYCUTa0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Mar 2008 15:30:26 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <47E33693.7080102@jp.fujitsu.com> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Kenji Kaneshige Cc: Alex Chiang , Greg KH , Gary Hade , Kristen Carlson Accardi , warthog19@eaglescrag.net, rick.jones2@hp.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 01:16:19PM +0900, Kenji Kaneshige wrote: > The 'slot' member in struct pci_dev is not used. Remove this unused > member. It *ought* to be used. If it isn't yet, I guess that part of my patch has been dropped, and it should be re-added. -- Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step."