From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Wilcox Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/16] PCI slot: Change return value of pci_destroy_slot() (Not for mainline!) Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 13:32:59 -0600 Message-ID: <20080321193259.GL424@parisc-linux.org> References: <20080318210539.GA30421@ldl.fc.hp.com> <47E33472.1000602@jp.fujitsu.com> <47E338E5.3020504@jp.fujitsu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from palinux.external.hp.com ([192.25.206.14]:47946 "EHLO mail.parisc-linux.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753222AbYCUTdA (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Mar 2008 15:33:00 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <47E338E5.3020504@jp.fujitsu.com> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Kenji Kaneshige Cc: Alex Chiang , Greg KH , Gary Hade , Kristen Carlson Accardi , warthog19@eaglescrag.net, rick.jones2@hp.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 01:26:13PM +0900, Kenji Kaneshige wrote: > Since nobody checks the return value from pci_destroy_slot(), it > should be void. ACK -- Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step."