From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
To: "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.25 regression: powertop says 120K wakeups/sec
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 12:44:26 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200803281244.27012.david-b@pacbell.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <924EFEDD5F540B4284297C4DC59F3DEEC83CDD@orsmsx423.amr.corp.intel.com>
On Friday 28 March 2008, Pallipadi, Venkatesh wrote:
> >> > I noticed this with 2.6.25-rc2 (if not before), and the problem
> >> > is still there with 2.6.25-rc6-git (as of this AM).
> >
> >A 2.6.24 kernel I still had stashed away didn't act odd; the
> >problem joined us before 2.6.25-rc1 was tagged.
> >
>
> There was a fix that went in recently (one or two days back) that should
> have fixed this.
> Commit 8e92b6605da989
>
> Can you check with latest git to see whether this is still a problem?
The problem is still there in GIT as of this morning, which
includes 8e92b6605da989 ...
Comments on why bc71bec91f9875ef825d12104acf3bf4ca215fa4 seems
to be causing this? I think it's just bad reports getting to
userspace, rather than an actual 120K wakeups/second. (The
report is of course not always 120K, but it's usually in that
range.)
- Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-28 19:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20080322202454.9D69DCC0EF@adsl-69-226-248-13.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net>
2008-03-23 0:35 ` 2.6.25 regression: powertop says 120K wakeups/sec Andrew Morton
2008-03-23 18:04 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2008-03-28 19:01 ` David Brownell
2008-03-28 19:13 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2008-03-28 19:44 ` David Brownell [this message]
2008-03-28 20:30 ` Venki Pallipadi
2008-03-28 21:09 ` David Brownell
2008-03-28 21:55 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2008-03-28 22:09 ` David Brownell
2008-03-28 22:56 ` Venki Pallipadi
2008-03-28 23:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-03-28 23:07 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2008-03-31 17:42 ` Mark Lord
2008-03-31 18:34 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2008-03-28 23:36 ` David Brownell
2008-03-28 23:51 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2008-03-29 0:15 ` David Brownell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200803281244.27012.david-b@pacbell.net \
--to=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox