public inbox for linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Venki Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Cc: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.25 regression: powertop says 120K wakeups/sec
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2008 00:01:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200803290001.18912.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080328225604.GA7136@linux-os.sc.intel.com>

On Friday, 28 of March 2008, Venki Pallipadi wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 03:09:22PM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> > On Friday 28 March 2008, Pallipadi, Venkatesh wrote:
> > > You should have a dmesg line which looks like
> > > ACPI: CPU0 (power states: C1[C1] C2[C2]
> > > Do you see C2 in such line?
> > 
> > Yes:
> > 
> > ACPI: CPU0 (power states: C1[C1] C2[C2])
> 
> 
> David,
> 
> I think I figured out the bug...
> 
> Can you try the below patch and confirm that it works (over upstream - ignore
> the earlier revert patch I sent to you).
> 
> Thanks,
> Venki
> 
> ----
> 
> 
> Patch to fix huge number of wakeups reported due to recent changes in
> processor_idle.c. The problem was that the entry_method determination was
> broken due to one of the recent commits (bc71bec91f987) causing
> C1 entry to not to go to halt. This should also fix the hang reported here.
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10093

Ah, thanks for figuring that out.  As a regression fix, it should go upstream
ASAP, I think.

 
> Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
> 
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c |    4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> Index: linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c	2008-03-28 15:31:13.000000000 -0700
> +++ linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c	2008-03-28 15:40:50.000000000 -0700
> @@ -848,6 +848,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_power_info
>  		/* all processors need to support C1 */
>  		pr->power.states[ACPI_STATE_C1].type = ACPI_STATE_C1;
>  		pr->power.states[ACPI_STATE_C1].valid = 1;
> +		pr->power.states[ACPI_STATE_C1].entry_method = ACPI_CSTATE_HALT;
>  	}
>  	/* the C0 state only exists as a filler in our array */
>  	pr->power.states[ACPI_STATE_C0].valid = 1;
> @@ -960,6 +961,9 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_power_info
>  				 cx.address);
>  		}
>  
> +		if (cx.type == ACPI_STATE_C1) {
> +			cx.valid = 1;
> +		}
>  
>  		obj = &(element->package.elements[2]);
>  		if (obj->type != ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER)
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2008-03-28 23:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20080322202454.9D69DCC0EF@adsl-69-226-248-13.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net>
2008-03-23  0:35 ` 2.6.25 regression: powertop says 120K wakeups/sec Andrew Morton
2008-03-23 18:04   ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2008-03-28 19:01   ` David Brownell
2008-03-28 19:13     ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2008-03-28 19:44       ` David Brownell
2008-03-28 20:30         ` Venki Pallipadi
2008-03-28 21:09           ` David Brownell
2008-03-28 21:55             ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2008-03-28 22:09               ` David Brownell
2008-03-28 22:56                 ` Venki Pallipadi
2008-03-28 23:01                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2008-03-28 23:07                     ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2008-03-31 17:42                     ` Mark Lord
2008-03-31 18:34                       ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2008-03-28 23:36                   ` David Brownell
2008-03-28 23:51                     ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2008-03-29  0:15                       ` David Brownell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200803290001.18912.rjw@sisk.pl \
    --to=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox