From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
To: "Zhang, Rui" <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: "Zhao, Yakui" <yakui.zhao@intel.com>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, lenb@kernel.org,
Alessandro Zummo <alessandro.zummo@towertech.it>
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH 1/3] Allow to override the RTC alarm time
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 01:27:34 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200804090127.35037.david-b@pacbell.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1207727167.27304.20.camel@acpi-hp-zz.sh.intel.com>
On Wednesday 09 April 2008, Zhang, Rui wrote:
> > > In current kernel when RTC alarm time is set and not fired,
> > > it is impossible to set RTC alarm again. But it is more
> > > reasonable that the RTC alarm time can be overrided.
> >
> > I'll disagree. The problem is that if some task is waiting
> > for the alarm at the specified time, you've just trashed the
> > alarm it was relying on.
>
> Hmm, what if the wakealarm is set by mistake?
> is there any chance that user can fix it?
Certainly; there are several ways to turn an alarm off.
With sysfs, just write a time in the past, as I recall...
If you're concerned about accidents, think of it this way:
the proposed patch would make it *REALLY EASY* to have
accidents with sysfs that bork the alarm state, which can
have been set by some task that's relying on it.
The current behavior doesn't prevent such borkage; it
can't, really, because of the alarm model. What it does
instead is force whatever shell script is doing that to be
explicit about *intending* such borkage ... requiring it
to disable existing alarms, instead of allowing accidents.
- Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-09 8:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-09 6:34 [RFC] [PATCH 1/3] Allow to override the RTC alarm time Zhao Yakui
2008-04-09 7:34 ` David Brownell
2008-04-09 7:46 ` Zhang, Rui
2008-04-09 8:27 ` David Brownell [this message]
2008-04-09 16:55 ` Zhao Yakui
2008-04-09 10:13 ` David Brownell
2008-04-10 11:08 ` Zhao Yakui
2008-04-11 5:13 ` David Brownell
2008-04-11 11:04 ` Zhao Yakui
2008-04-11 3:46 ` David Brownell
2008-04-11 12:44 ` Zhao Yakui
2008-04-11 5:12 ` David Brownell
2008-04-11 6:30 ` Alessandro Zummo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200804090127.35037.david-b@pacbell.net \
--to=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=alessandro.zummo@towertech.it \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=yakui.zhao@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox