public inbox for linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
To: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com>
Cc: "Zhang, Rui" <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, lenb@kernel.org,
	Alessandro Zummo <alessandro.zummo@towertech.it>
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH 1/3] Allow to override the RTC alarm time
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 03:13:34 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200804090313.34805.david-b@pacbell.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1207760125.4056.30.camel@yakui_zhao.sh.intel.com>

On Wednesday 09 April 2008, Zhao Yakui wrote:
> > > Hmm, what if the wakealarm is set by mistake?
> > > is there any chance that user can fix it?
> > 
> > Certainly; there are several ways to turn an alarm off.
> > With sysfs, just write a time in the past, as I recall...
> > 
> > If you're concerned about accidents, think of it this way:
> > the proposed patch would make it *REALLY EASY* to have
> > accidents with sysfs that bork the alarm state, which can
> > have been set by some task that's relying on it.
> 
> But how to solve the following case?
> 
> It is assumed that the RTC alarm is set by some task and not fired (It
> will be fired after 20 minutes). The system enters the sleeping state
> and is required to be resumed after some time(For example: ten minutes).
> 
> How to set the RTC alarm?

You mean, how to decide which alarm setting should "win"?
If sysfs accidents aren't going to trump everything else.

That's a fair question.  I don't think there's a good answer
to that with today's infrastructure.  Arguably, there should
be the notion of a number of clients, each of which get told
when the alarm they request fires.  But today, there's only
a single alarm, and a single client.

- Dave




  reply	other threads:[~2008-04-09 10:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-04-09  6:34 [RFC] [PATCH 1/3] Allow to override the RTC alarm time Zhao Yakui
2008-04-09  7:34 ` David Brownell
2008-04-09  7:46   ` Zhang, Rui
2008-04-09  8:27     ` David Brownell
2008-04-09 16:55       ` Zhao Yakui
2008-04-09 10:13         ` David Brownell [this message]
2008-04-10 11:08           ` Zhao Yakui
2008-04-11  5:13             ` David Brownell
2008-04-11 11:04           ` Zhao Yakui
2008-04-11  3:46             ` David Brownell
2008-04-11 12:44               ` Zhao Yakui
2008-04-11  5:12                 ` David Brownell
2008-04-11  6:30                 ` Alessandro Zummo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200804090313.34805.david-b@pacbell.net \
    --to=david-b@pacbell.net \
    --cc=alessandro.zummo@towertech.it \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=yakui.zhao@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox