public inbox for linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: [PATCH 2.6.25-rc7 001/001] ACPI: workaround for buggy BIOS to ignore error LINK CRS method
       [not found] <f7430a760804090842s44ece7bh216d5d28e347955@mail.gmail.com>
@ 2008-04-09 23:12 ` Andrew Morton
  2008-04-10 10:40   ` Zhao Yakui
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2008-04-09 23:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: NoWhereMan; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-acpi, Len Brown, Zhao Yakui

On Wed, 9 Apr 2008 17:42:34 +0200
NoWhereMan <uncommonnonsense@gmail.com> wrote:

> >From : Edoardo Vacchi <uncommonnonsense@gmail.com>
> 
> When acpi_pci_link_crs_ignore is passed at boot to the kernel,
> ignores the error about the _CRS method of LINK device and selects
> IRQ from possible IRQ list returned by _PRS method.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Edoardo Vacchi <uncommonnonsense@gmail.com>
> 

Let's add some cc's.

> 
> This is nothing more than the patch on comment #127 on bug #8896
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8896#c127
> 
> originally by Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com>
> 
> ported to 2.6.25 and wrapped into an additional check for the kernel parameter
> (plus of course the defintion of the kernel param itself)
> 
> The patch provides a workaround for some buggy BIOSes such as Insyde
> in Packard Bell EasyNote r1938 (of which I'm an unfortunate owner),
> while still keeping boot safe for people not suffering from this bug
> 

That patch is about four months old.  Hopefully there was a reason why we
dodn't proceed with it?


> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> index 233c40c..ed54c63 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> @@ -297,6 +297,16 @@ static int acpi_pci_link_get_current(struct
> acpi_pci_link *link)
>         return result;
>  }
> 
> +
> +/*
> + * this is set when acpi_pci_link_crs_ignore is passed on boot
> + * it will ignore the -ENODEV error on buggy BIOSes
> + *
> + * workaround for bug #8896
> + *
> + */
> +static int acpi_pci_link_crs_ignore; /* 0 or 1*/
> +
>  static int acpi_pci_link_set(struct acpi_pci_link *link, int irq)
>  {
>         int result = 0;
> @@ -385,9 +395,16 @@ static int acpi_pci_link_set(struct acpi_pci_link
> *link, int irq)
> 
>         /* Query _CRS, set link->irq.active */
>         result = acpi_pci_link_get_current(link);
> -       if (result) {
> -               goto end;
> -       }
> +       if (acpi_pci_link_crs_ignore && result == -ENODEV) {
> +               /*
> +                * Ignore the error about the _CRS method of Link device and
> +                * select IRQ from the Possible IRQ list
> +                * returned by _PRS method.
> +                */
> +                printk(KERN_WARNING "Ignore error LINK CRS method.\n");
> +                link->irq.active = irq;
> +                result = 0;
> +        }
> 
>         /*
>          * Is current setting not what we set?
> @@ -412,7 +429,16 @@ static int acpi_pci_link_set(struct acpi_pci_link
> *link, int irq)
>         return result;
>  }
> 
> -/* --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> +int __init acpi_pci_link_crs_ignore_set(char *str)
> +{
> +       acpi_pci_link_crs_ignore = 1;
> +       return 1;
> +}
> +
> +__setup("acpi_pci_link_crs_ignore", acpi_pci_link_crs_ignore_set);
> +
> +
> + /* --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                              PCI Link IRQ Management
>     --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> */
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 2.6.25-rc7 001/001] ACPI: workaround for buggy BIOS to ignore error LINK CRS method
  2008-04-09 23:12 ` [PATCH 2.6.25-rc7 001/001] ACPI: workaround for buggy BIOS to ignore error LINK CRS method Andrew Morton
@ 2008-04-10 10:40   ` Zhao Yakui
  2008-04-10 12:23     ` NoWhereMan
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Zhao Yakui @ 2008-04-10 10:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: NoWhereMan; +Cc: Andrew Morton, linux-kernel, linux-acpi, Len Brown

On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 16:12 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Apr 2008 17:42:34 +0200
> NoWhereMan <uncommonnonsense@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > >From : Edoardo Vacchi <uncommonnonsense@gmail.com>
> > 
> > When acpi_pci_link_crs_ignore is passed at boot to the kernel,
> > ignores the error about the _CRS method of LINK device and selects
> > IRQ from possible IRQ list returned by _PRS method.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Edoardo Vacchi <uncommonnonsense@gmail.com>
> > 
> 
> Let's add some cc's.
> 
> > 
> > This is nothing more than the patch on comment #127 on bug #8896
> > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8896#c127
> > 
> > originally by Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com>
> > 
> > ported to 2.6.25 and wrapped into an additional check for the kernel parameter
> > (plus of course the defintion of the kernel param itself)
> > 
> > The patch provides a workaround for some buggy BIOSes such as Insyde
> > in Packard Bell EasyNote r1938 (of which I'm an unfortunate owner),
> > while still keeping boot safe for people not suffering from this bug
> > 
> 
> That patch is about four months old.  Hopefully there was a reason why we
> dodn't proceed with it?
It seems that the system can work after applying the patch. 
But the patch depends on the returned result(-ENODEV).
> if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
>               ACPI_EXCEPTION((AE_INFO, status, "Evaluating _CRS"));
>                result = -ENODEV;
 >               goto end;
 >       }
Now I am writing another workaround patch about this problem.
> 
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> > index 233c40c..ed54c63 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> > @@ -297,6 +297,16 @@ static int acpi_pci_link_get_current(struct
> > acpi_pci_link *link)
> >         return result;
> >  }
> > 
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * this is set when acpi_pci_link_crs_ignore is passed on boot
> > + * it will ignore the -ENODEV error on buggy BIOSes
> > + *
> > + * workaround for bug #8896
> > + *
> > + */
> > +static int acpi_pci_link_crs_ignore; /* 0 or 1*/
> > +
> >  static int acpi_pci_link_set(struct acpi_pci_link *link, int irq)
> >  {
> >         int result = 0;
> > @@ -385,9 +395,16 @@ static int acpi_pci_link_set(struct acpi_pci_link
> > *link, int irq)
> > 
> >         /* Query _CRS, set link->irq.active */
> >         result = acpi_pci_link_get_current(link);
> > -       if (result) {
> > -               goto end;
> > -       }
> > +       if (acpi_pci_link_crs_ignore && result == -ENODEV) {
> > +               /*
> > +                * Ignore the error about the _CRS method of Link device and
> > +                * select IRQ from the Possible IRQ list
> > +                * returned by _PRS method.
> > +                */
> > +                printk(KERN_WARNING "Ignore error LINK CRS method.\n");
> > +                link->irq.active = irq;
> > +                result = 0;
> > +        }
> > 
> >         /*
> >          * Is current setting not what we set?
> > @@ -412,7 +429,16 @@ static int acpi_pci_link_set(struct acpi_pci_link
> > *link, int irq)
> >         return result;
> >  }
> > 
> > -/* --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > +int __init acpi_pci_link_crs_ignore_set(char *str)
> > +{
> > +       acpi_pci_link_crs_ignore = 1;
> > +       return 1;
> > +}
> > +
> > +__setup("acpi_pci_link_crs_ignore", acpi_pci_link_crs_ignore_set);
> > +
> > +
> > + /* --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >                              PCI Link IRQ Management
> >     --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > */
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 2.6.25-rc7 001/001] ACPI: workaround for buggy BIOS to ignore error LINK CRS method
  2008-04-10 10:40   ` Zhao Yakui
@ 2008-04-10 12:23     ` NoWhereMan
  2008-04-15 13:49       ` Zhao Yakui
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: NoWhereMan @ 2008-04-10 12:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Zhao Yakui; +Cc: Andrew Morton, linux-kernel, linux-acpi, Len Brown

On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 12:40 PM, Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 16:12 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:

>  > That patch is about four months old.  Hopefully there was a reason why we
>  > dodn't proceed with it?
>  It seems that the system can work after applying the patch.
>  But the patch depends on the returned result(-ENODEV).
>  > if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
>  >               ACPI_EXCEPTION((AE_INFO, status, "Evaluating _CRS"));
>  >                result = -ENODEV;
>   >               goto end;
>   >       }
>  Now I am writing another workaround patch about this problem.

I'll try to help, testing the new patch on my system

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 2.6.25-rc7 001/001] ACPI: workaround for buggy BIOS to ignore error LINK CRS method
  2008-04-10 12:23     ` NoWhereMan
@ 2008-04-15 13:49       ` Zhao Yakui
       [not found]         ` <f7430a760804150121ndfaf065j332ebf1cee3c572@mail.gmail.com>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Zhao Yakui @ 2008-04-15 13:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: NoWhereMan; +Cc: Andrew Morton, linux-kernel, linux-acpi, Len Brown

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 844 bytes --]

On Thu, 2008-04-10 at 14:23 +0200, NoWhereMan wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 12:40 PM, Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 16:12 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> 
> >  > That patch is about four months old.  Hopefully there was a reason why we
> >  > dodn't proceed with it?
> >  It seems that the system can work after applying the patch.
> >  But the patch depends on the returned result(-ENODEV).
> >  > if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> >  >               ACPI_EXCEPTION((AE_INFO, status, "Evaluating _CRS"));
> >  >                result = -ENODEV;
> >   >               goto end;
> >   >       }
> >  Now I am writing another workaround patch about this problem.
> 
Will you please try the workaround patch and see whether the problem can
be fixed?
Thanks.
> I'll try to help, testing the new patch on my system

[-- Attachment #2: crs_debug.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 2869 bytes --]

An integer is returned by _CRS/_PRS object of LINK device
for some broken bios( the HID of LINK device is "PNP0C0F").
In such case irq_number will be constructed as the Extended
IRQ descriptor.
The content of the buffer should be the following:
0x89,0x06,0x00,0x0D,0x01,0x0,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x79,0x00.
And the length of the buffer is 11.

---
 drivers/acpi/resources/rsutils.c |   47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/resources/rsutils.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/acpi/resources/rsutils.c
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/resources/rsutils.c
@@ -611,7 +611,11 @@ acpi_rs_get_method_data(acpi_handle hand
 			char *path, struct acpi_buffer *ret_buffer)
 {
 	union acpi_operand_object *obj_desc;
+	struct acpi_namespace_node *device_node = NULL;
 	acpi_status status;
+	u8 *ptr = NULL;
+	u32 irq_number = 0;
+	struct acpica_device_id hid;
 
 	ACPI_FUNCTION_TRACE(rs_get_method_data);
 
@@ -622,9 +626,48 @@ acpi_rs_get_method_data(acpi_handle hand
 	status =
 	    acpi_ut_evaluate_object(handle, path, ACPI_BTYPE_BUFFER, &obj_desc);
 	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
-		return_ACPI_STATUS(status);
+		/*
+		 * An integer is returned by _CRS/_PRS object of LINK device
+		 * for some broken bios( the HID of LINK device is "PNP0C0F").
+		 * In such case irq_number will be constructed as the Extended
+		 * IRQ descriptor.
+		 * The content of the buffer should be the following:
+		 * 0x89,0x06,0x00,0x0D,0x01,0x0,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x79,0x00.
+		 * And the length of the buffer is 11.
+		 */
+		device_node = acpi_ns_map_handle_to_node(handle);
+		status = acpi_ut_execute_HID(device_node, &hid);
+		/* Now only LINK device is supported */
+		if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) || ACPI_STRNCMP(hid.value,
+					"PNP0C0F", sizeof(hid.value))) {
+			ACPI_WARNING((AE_INFO , "Only LINK device supports "
+				" the workaround patch"));
+			return_ACPI_STATUS(AE_SUPPORT);
+		}
+
+		status = acpi_ut_evaluate_object(handle, path,
+				ACPI_BTYPE_INTEGER, &obj_desc);
+		if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
+			return_ACPI_STATUS(status);
+
+		if (ACPI_GET_OBJECT_TYPE(obj_desc) == ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER) {
+			#define IRQ_OFFSET	5
+		 	char fixed_irq_buffer[] = { 0x89, 0x06, 0x0, 0x0D,
+				0x01, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x79, 0x0 };
+			irq_number = obj_desc->integer.value;
+			acpi_ut_remove_reference(obj_desc);
+			obj_desc = acpi_ut_create_buffer_object(
+					sizeof(fixed_irq_buffer));
+			if (!obj_desc)
+				return_ACPI_STATUS(AE_NO_MEMORY);
+
+			ptr = obj_desc->buffer.pointer;
+			ACPI_MEMCPY(ptr, fixed_irq_buffer,
+					sizeof(fixed_irq_buffer));
+			ptr += IRQ_OFFSET;
+			ACPI_MOVE_32_TO_32(ptr, &irq_number);
+		}
 	}
-
 	/*
 	 * Make the call to create a resource linked list from the
 	 * byte stream buffer that comes back from the method

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 2.6.25-rc7 001/001] ACPI: workaround for buggy BIOS to ignore error LINK CRS method
       [not found]             ` <f7430a760804161154o77dd7fc5g622d3bbe4fa1183b@mail.gmail.com>
@ 2008-04-21 13:13               ` NoWhereMan
  2008-04-22 13:37                 ` Zhao Yakui
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: NoWhereMan @ 2008-04-21 13:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Zhao Yakui; +Cc: Andrew Morton, linux-kernel, linux-acpi, Len Brown

patch is working; cc'ing to ML

On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 8:54 PM, NoWhereMan <uncommonnonsense@gmail.com> wrote:
> FYI it wasn't latest git but still rc7; I've fast-forwarded now to
>  rc9, but if no significant changes were made on that part of acpi I'm
>  sure it will work anyway
>
>
>
>  On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 12:38 AM, NoWhereMan <uncommonnonsense@gmail.com> wrote:
>  > hi Zhao,
>  >
>  >  I've applied the patch to latest linus git, boot went flawlessly
>  >  (except the usual error messages about _CRS method) and both wireless
>  >  and USB work, so I'm assuming it worked.
>  >
>  >  I'm attaching my dmesg just for reference. I've enabled ACPI debugging
>  >  in my kernel config.
>  >
>  >  thank you a lot for your efforts with this bug
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >  On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 10:21 AM, NoWhereMan <uncommonnonsense@gmail.com> wrote:
>  >  > On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 3:49 PM, Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com> wrote:
>  >  >
>  >  >  >  Will you please try the workaround patch and see whether the problem can
>  >  >  >  be fixed?
>  >  >  >  Thanks.
>  >  >
>  >  >  I will as soon as possible, thank you for your efforts!
>  >  >
>  >
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 2.6.25-rc7 001/001] ACPI: workaround for buggy BIOS to ignore error LINK CRS method
  2008-04-21 13:13               ` NoWhereMan
@ 2008-04-22 13:37                 ` Zhao Yakui
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Zhao Yakui @ 2008-04-22 13:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: NoWhereMan; +Cc: Andrew Morton, linux-kernel, linux-acpi, Len Brown

On Mon, 2008-04-21 at 15:13 +0200, NoWhereMan wrote:
> patch is working; cc'ing to ML
> 
Thanks for the test.
I will try to push Len to merge this patch.
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 8:54 PM, NoWhereMan <uncommonnonsense@gmail.com> wrote:
> > FYI it wasn't latest git but still rc7; I've fast-forwarded now to
> >  rc9, but if no significant changes were made on that part of acpi I'm
> >  sure it will work anyway
> >
> >
> >
> >  On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 12:38 AM, NoWhereMan <uncommonnonsense@gmail.com> wrote:
> >  > hi Zhao,
> >  >
> >  >  I've applied the patch to latest linus git, boot went flawlessly
> >  >  (except the usual error messages about _CRS method) and both wireless
> >  >  and USB work, so I'm assuming it worked.
> >  >
> >  >  I'm attaching my dmesg just for reference. I've enabled ACPI debugging
> >  >  in my kernel config.
> >  >
> >  >  thank you a lot for your efforts with this bug
> >  >
> >  >
> >  >
> >  >  On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 10:21 AM, NoWhereMan <uncommonnonsense@gmail.com> wrote:
> >  >  > On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 3:49 PM, Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com> wrote:
> >  >  >
> >  >  >  >  Will you please try the workaround patch and see whether the problem can
> >  >  >  >  be fixed?
> >  >  >  >  Thanks.
> >  >  >
> >  >  >  I will as soon as possible, thank you for your efforts!
> >  >  >
> >  >
> >


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2008-04-22  5:46 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <f7430a760804090842s44ece7bh216d5d28e347955@mail.gmail.com>
2008-04-09 23:12 ` [PATCH 2.6.25-rc7 001/001] ACPI: workaround for buggy BIOS to ignore error LINK CRS method Andrew Morton
2008-04-10 10:40   ` Zhao Yakui
2008-04-10 12:23     ` NoWhereMan
2008-04-15 13:49       ` Zhao Yakui
     [not found]         ` <f7430a760804150121ndfaf065j332ebf1cee3c572@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]           ` <f7430a760804151538v410f7c64m21d90cb9da8e9baa@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]             ` <f7430a760804161154o77dd7fc5g622d3bbe4fa1183b@mail.gmail.com>
2008-04-21 13:13               ` NoWhereMan
2008-04-22 13:37                 ` Zhao Yakui

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox