From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Len Brown Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.25 (coretemp reads high temperatures) Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 21:51:48 -0400 Message-ID: <200804182151.49021.lenb@kernel.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Matthew , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Friday 18 April 2008, Matthew wrote: > Hi everyone, hi Linus, >=20 > congratulations on this new great kernel-release :) >=20 > I've another "regression" to report for 2.6.25: >=20 > it's concerning much higher temperatures being read out by the > "coretemp" kernel-module in comparison to 2.6.24* series >=20 > e.g. where temperatures were around 40-47=B0C they are now constantly > jumping around 55-70=B0C (even in idle !) >=20 > several other users/testers have reported this issue too (both on > zen-sources [heavy patched] & latest gentoo-sources) [slightly > patched]: >=20 > http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-684812-highlight-.html >=20 > if I understood git right it (also) happens in conjunction with an 3 > weeks old acpi-snapshot > (http://repo.or.cz/w/linux-2.6/zen-sources.git?a=3Dheads) integrated = in > zen-sources >=20 > I can "reproduce" this on an Intel Core 2 Duo 6600 (Conroe) with a P5= W > DH Deluxe mainboard (by Asus) since at least 2.6.25-rc8 (or possibly > also rc7) >=20 > the temperatures on mobile core (2) duo intel processors [e.g. an > T7500] seem to be read out correctly - I can't tell it exactly but > this seems to be an entirely "cosmetical" issue > (hopefully it's not the opposite and the values are now read out > correctly since such high temps would be very worrying ;) ) >=20 > Keep up the great work & please don't forget your growing amount of > linux-desktop users :) >=20 > Regards >=20 > Mat Hello Mat, I'm not familiar with "coretemp", can you point me to the exact version of the application you are running so I can see how it is getting at the underlying information? Also, do you see any change with and without kernel built with CONFIG_T= HERMAL=3Dy? thanks, -Len