From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Garrett Subject: Re: About p4-clockmod breakage/removal Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 13:56:18 +0100 Message-ID: <20080514125618.GA32422@srcf.ucam.org> References: <48246C3E.7010608@ceibo.fiec.espol.edu.ec> <200805132048.00653.lenb@kernel.org> <20080514005636.GA21608@srcf.ucam.org> <1210764974.29724.181.camel@queen.suse.de> <20080514114215.GA31135@srcf.ucam.org> <1210769358.21269.21.camel@queen.suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1210769358.21269.21.camel@queen.suse.de> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: cpufreq-bounces@lists.linux.org.uk Errors-To: cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=gmane.org+glkc-cpufreq=gmane.org@lists.linux.org.uk To: Thomas Renninger Cc: cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 02:49:18PM +0200, Thomas Renninger wrote: > You might find a hack to modify this, by reading P4 (this seem to sit in > the CPU itself?) or chipset specs. But again, is it worth it for a P4 > where no power saving capabilities are present anyway? If the alternative is thermal shutdown, sure. I'll take a look through the specs. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org