From: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
To: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Subject:ACPI: Send the reserved AC notification event to user space
Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 19:04:18 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200805141904.18579.lenb@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1210733239.7932.10.camel@yakui_zhao.sh.intel.com>
On Tuesday 13 May 2008, Zhao Yakui wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-05-13 at 20:55 -0400, Len Brown wrote:
> > On Friday 09 May 2008, Zhao Yakui wrote:
> > > Subject:ACPI: Send the reserved AC notification event to user space
> > > >From : Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com>
> > >
> > > On some laptops the bogus bios sends the reserved AC notification event(0x81)
> > > when the AC adapter is plugged/unplugged .It can't be sent to
> > > user space, which causes that user space application can't
> > > receive the AC adapter event.
> > > So the reserved AC adapter event(0x81) is still sent to the user space
> > > so that user space can receive the notification event.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/acpi/ac.c | 4 ++++
> > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > Index: linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/ac.c
> > > ===================================================================
> > > --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/acpi/ac.c
> > > +++ linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/ac.c
> > > @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
> > > #define ACPI_AC_DEVICE_NAME "AC Adapter"
> > > #define ACPI_AC_FILE_STATE "state"
> > > #define ACPI_AC_NOTIFY_STATUS 0x80
> > > +#define ACPI_AC_NOTIFY_RESERVED 0x81
> > > #define ACPI_AC_STATUS_OFFLINE 0x00
> > > #define ACPI_AC_STATUS_ONLINE 0x01
> > > #define ACPI_AC_STATUS_UNKNOWN 0xFF
> > > @@ -233,6 +234,9 @@ static void acpi_ac_notify(acpi_handle h
> > >
> > > device = ac->device;
> > > switch (event) {
> > > + case ACPI_AC_NOTIFY_RESERVED:
> >
> > shouldn't this line above be "default:"
> If the follwing debug info is not needed, it will be OK to put it above
> the "default" branch.
> > "Unsupported event [0x%x]\n", event.
> When this line is put above the "AC_NOTIFY_STATUS" branch, it can send
> the notification event to user space while printing the debug info.
> > and the default: below this patch be removed?
> Had better not remove the default branch. If other type of notification
> event is sent to AC device, the debug info can be printed. It will be
> helpful to find the root cause.
> > -Len
> >
> > > + ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO,
> > > + "Unsupported event [0x%x]\n", event));
> > > case ACPI_AC_NOTIFY_STATUS:
> > > case ACPI_NOTIFY_BUS_CHECK:
> > > case ACPI_NOTIFY_DEVICE_CHECK:
> > >
> > >
Maybe I'm too tired to parse what you're saying.
What is the matter with doing it this way:
(this is now bugzilla 10695, btw.
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/ac.c b/drivers/acpi/ac.c
index 5b73f6a..831883b 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/ac.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/ac.c
@@ -233,6 +233,9 @@ static void acpi_ac_notify(acpi_handle handle, u32 event, void *data)
device = ac->device;
switch (event) {
+ default:
+ ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO,
+ "Unsupported event [0x%x]\n", event));
case ACPI_AC_NOTIFY_STATUS:
case ACPI_NOTIFY_BUS_CHECK:
case ACPI_NOTIFY_DEVICE_CHECK:
@@ -244,11 +247,6 @@ static void acpi_ac_notify(acpi_handle handle, u32 event, void *data)
#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_SYSFS_POWER
kobject_uevent(&ac->charger.dev->kobj, KOBJ_CHANGE);
#endif
- break;
- default:
- ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO,
- "Unsupported event [0x%x]\n", event));
- break;
}
return;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-14 23:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-08 3:35 [PATCH] ACPI:avoid printing the error message that processor device is not present Zhao Yakui
2007-10-10 3:43 ` Len Brown
2007-10-15 1:19 ` Zhao Yakui
2007-11-07 12:34 ` [PATCH_1/4] :Add the _TPC throttling limit for TSS Zhao Yakui
2007-11-07 12:34 ` [PATCH_2/4] : Modify the ACPI I/O Access width Zhao Yakui
2007-11-07 12:35 ` [Patch_3/4]:Throttling control uses T-states returned by _TSS when _TSS exists Zhao Yakui
2007-11-07 12:35 ` [Patch_4/4] :Add MSR support for T-States Zhao Yakui
2007-11-08 0:56 ` [PATCH_1/4] :Add the _TPC throttling limit for TSS Zhao Yakui
2007-11-15 2:52 ` Len Brown
2007-11-08 0:56 ` [PATCH_2/4] : Modify the ACPI I/O Access width Zhao Yakui
2007-11-08 0:57 ` [Patch_3/4]:Throttling control uses T-states returned by _TSS when _TSS exists Zhao Yakui
2007-11-08 0:57 ` [Patch_4/4] :Add MSR support for T-States Zhao Yakui
2007-11-15 3:22 ` Len Brown
2007-11-08 1:25 ` [PATCH] [ACPI ]: Init PDC before getting throttling info Zhao Yakui
2007-11-15 8:41 ` [PATCH_2/7] : Modify the ACPI I/O Access width Zhao Yakui
2007-11-15 8:41 ` [Patch_3/7] ACPI: Not use calculated T-states from FADT.duty_width when _TSS exists Zhao Yakui
2007-11-15 8:41 ` [Patch_4/7] :Change the function interface for throttling control via PTC Zhao Yakui
2007-11-15 8:42 ` [Patch_5/7 ] :Throttling control uses T-states returned by _TSS when _TSS exists Zhao Yakui
2007-11-15 8:59 ` [PATCH_1/7] ACPI: Add the _TPC throttling limit for TSS Zhao Yakui
2007-11-15 9:01 ` [PATCH_2/7] ACPI: Modify the ACPI I/O Access width Zhao Yakui
2007-11-15 9:02 ` [PATCH_3/7] ACPI: Not use calculated T-states from FADT.duty_width when _TSS exists Zhao Yakui
2007-11-15 9:03 ` [PATCH_4/7] ACPI: Change the function interface for throttling control via PTC Zhao Yakui
2007-11-15 9:05 ` [PATCH_5/7] ACPI: Throttling control uses T-states returned by _TSS when _TSS exists Zhao Yakui
2007-11-15 9:05 ` [PATCH_6/7] ACPI: Init PDC before getting throttling info Zhao Yakui
2007-11-15 9:06 ` [PATCH_7/7] ACPI: Add MSR support for T-States Zhao Yakui
2007-11-15 9:18 ` [PATCH] ACPI: Disable all GPEs before re-enable interrupts Zhao Yakui
2008-05-09 9:22 ` Subject:ACPI: Send the reserved AC notification event to user space Zhao Yakui
2008-05-14 0:55 ` Len Brown
2008-05-14 2:47 ` Zhao Yakui
2008-05-14 23:04 ` Len Brown [this message]
2008-05-15 13:55 ` Zhao Yakui
2008-05-14 3:32 ` [PATCH]: ACPI: Disable Fixed_RTC event when installing RTC handler Zhao Yakui
2008-05-14 4:33 ` Len Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200805141904.18579.lenb@kernel.org \
--to=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yakui.zhao@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).