public inbox for linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
To: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Cc: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	linux acpi <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] pci-acpi: improvement for _OSC evaluation
Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 15:27:51 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200805191527.51549.jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1211167762.2836.0.camel@sli10-desk.sh.intel.com>

On Sunday, May 18, 2008 8:29 pm Shaohua Li wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-05-16 at 11:00 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > On Wednesday, May 14, 2008 11:17 pm Kenji Kaneshige wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Here are some improvement patches for _OSC evaluation on PCI.
> > >
> > > - [PATCH 1/5] pci-acpi: remove duplicate code for _OSC
> > > - [PATCH 2/5] pci-acpi: use local buffer for _OSC
> > > - [PATCH 3/5] pci-acpi: add flag to indicate query had been done
> > > - [PATCH 4/5] pci-acpi: remove unused variable in __pci_osc_support_set
> > > - [PATCH 5/5] pci-acpi: minor cleanups for _OSC
> > >
> > > For details, please see the header of each patch.
> >
> > These cleanups look nice; Shaohua maybe you could take a look too and
> > ack/nack?
>
> Looks good. ACKed.

Great, thanks for the review.  Applied to linux-next.

Thanks,
Jesse

      reply	other threads:[~2008-05-19 22:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-05-15  6:17 [PATCH 0/5] pci-acpi: improvement for _OSC evaluation Kenji Kaneshige
2008-05-15  6:18 ` [PATCH 1/5] pci-acpi: remove duplicate code for _OSC Kenji Kaneshige
2008-05-15  6:20 ` [PATCH 2/5] pci-acpi: use local buffer " Kenji Kaneshige
2008-05-15  6:21 ` [PATCH 3/5] pci-acpi: add flag to indicate query had been done Kenji Kaneshige
2008-05-15  6:22 ` [PATCH 4/5] pci-acpi: remove unused variable in __pci_osc_support_set Kenji Kaneshige
2008-05-15  6:23 ` [PATCH 5/5] pci-acpi: minor cleanups for _OSC Kenji Kaneshige
2008-05-16 18:00 ` [PATCH 0/5] pci-acpi: improvement for _OSC evaluation Jesse Barnes
2008-05-19  3:29   ` Shaohua Li
2008-05-19 22:27     ` Jesse Barnes [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200805191527.51549.jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
    --to=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
    --cc=kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox