From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: linux-next Regression: Unable to locate IOAPIC Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 11:50:24 -0700 Message-ID: <20080606115024.387b5f80.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <200806051100.12885.dex@dragonslave.de> <20080606031718.36cbbdc9.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <200806061930.29046.dex@dragonslave.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:57806 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755063AbYFFSub (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Jun 2008 14:50:31 -0400 In-Reply-To: <200806061930.29046.dex@dragonslave.de> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: webmaster@dragonslave.de Cc: Daniel Exner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 6 Jun 2008 19:30:28 +0200 Daniel Exner wrote: > Andrew Morton wrote: > > (cc linux-acpi) > > > > On Thu, 5 Jun 2008 11:00:12 +0200 Daniel Exner wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > > > (Added myself to CC, because I'm not subscribed) > > > > > > with linux-next snapshot 20080604 my Laptop morphes into sitting duck and > > > I think this is due to this: > > > > I assume 2.6.26-rc5 is OK? > Indeed.. just tried it with (nearly) the same config: no unable to locate > IOAPIC > > Will try todays next snapshot above -rc5 now. OK, thanks. It would be great if you could test 2.6.26-rc5 plus http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/git-acpi.patch. That'll allow us to confirm that the regression is due to changes in the acpi tree. > BTW: Any chance to get this damn thing to not route everything by IRQ 11 !? ooh, wrong guy to ask, sorry.