From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Garrett Subject: Re: [RFC] Allow notifications on method execution Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 23:37:03 +0100 Message-ID: <20080620223703.GA19378@srcf.ucam.org> References: <20080620152227.GA11828@srcf.ucam.org> <20080620193941.GC20498@khazad-dum.debian.net> <20080620195840.GA16284@srcf.ucam.org> <20080620220120.GB3417@khazad-dum.debian.net> <20080620221308.GB18980@srcf.ucam.org> <20080620223344.GC3417@khazad-dum.debian.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([93.93.128.6]:56934 "EHLO vavatch.codon.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753795AbYFTWhG (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jun 2008 18:37:06 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080620223344.GC3417@khazad-dum.debian.net> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, ibm-acpi@hmh.eng.br On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 07:33:44PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > It works marginally better if one traps the GPE, as that looks a lot > more like what one gets in a modern thinkpad instead of what one gets > from the NVRAM (look at the nvram polling code in thinkpad-acpi to > understand what I mean. Some not so pretty crap was required in there > due to deal with loss of information in the VOLUME/MUTE handling...) Heh. Yeah, that's true. > Anyway, if we add notifications for normal nodes, please add them for > GPEs too. I'll look into that. With luck it'd let us remove polling from some of the other laptop hotkey drivers too. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org