From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: don't walk tables if ACPI was disabled Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 09:07:40 +0200 Message-ID: <20080625070740.GA8506@elte.hu> References: <20080620135639.GA5073@damson.getinternet.no> <19f34abd0806201340t502ce471n578dd2498a5f1992@mail.gmail.com> <19f34abd0806201427h740ca3e7gc2f01c7e34616fd4@mail.gmail.com> <19f34abd0806210119o64a1c9ban78710651a01530cf@mail.gmail.com> <20080624114139.GC21890@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:57800 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752185AbYFYHIM (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jun 2008 03:08:12 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Len Brown Cc: Vegard Nossum , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Zhao Yakui , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Alexey Starikovskiy , Yinghai Lu , Bjorn Helgaas * Len Brown wrote: > > > and now I understand the purpose of the check; pnpbios does not > > > depend on ACPI; ACPI/pnpacpi is incompatible with pnpbios. > > > > wow, rather old bug - i guess lockdep made it more visible. > > No, that commit was not a bug, it was correct, and still is, for > pnpACPI and pnpBIOS must be mutually exclusive. > > The thing that changed was the RTC specific code. ok. Vegard's patch/workaround got my test setup going, i'll drop it if something better comes along. (tip/out-of-tree commits dont get propagated into linux-next so it will not interfere with anything) Ingo