From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Garrett Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for June 13: IO APIC breakage on HP nx6325 Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 10:06:07 +0100 Message-ID: <20080630090607.GA18856@srcf.ucam.org> References: <20080613232214.394fd6fd.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <200806292123.16237.rjw@sisk.pl> <200806300056.16399.rjw@sisk.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([93.93.128.6]:33071 "EHLO vavatch.codon.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751385AbYF3JGY (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jun 2008 05:06:24 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Ingo Molnar , Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Thomas Gleixner , ACPI Devel Maling List , Len Brown , Andi Kleen , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 02:00:04AM +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > The DSDT is clearly associated with the SB400 southbridge. I would not > expect a given make and model to use different southbridges across the > series, so there will only be one DSDT per model, possibly in a number of > revisions. On the other hand different models may use the same > southbridge and hence the same DSDT. > > Note that Matthew's made a point here, that apparently there are only two > models using this southbridge and new ones are unlikely to be released, so > my note is for a reference only. No, there's many other systems using the same southbridge that don't have the bizarre DSDT code and so don't show this behaviour. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org