From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
pm list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
Subject: [PATCH 5/9] ACPI: Introduce acpi_device_sleep_wake function
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 00:06:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200807020006.52838.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200807012356.26669.rjw@sisk.pl>
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
ACPI: Introduce acpi_device_sleep_wake function
The currect ACPI code attempts to execute _PSW at three different
places and in one of them only it tries to execute _DSW before _PSW,
which is inconsistent with the other two cases.
Move the execution of _DSW and _PSW into a separate function called
acpi_device_sleep_wake() and call it wherever appropriate instead of
executing _DSW and/or _PSW directly.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
---
drivers/acpi/power.c | 118 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
drivers/acpi/scan.c | 42 ++-------------
drivers/acpi/sleep/wakeup.c | 2
include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h | 4 +
4 files changed, 92 insertions(+), 74 deletions(-)
Index: linux-next/drivers/acpi/power.c
===================================================================
--- linux-next.orig/drivers/acpi/power.c
+++ linux-next/drivers/acpi/power.c
@@ -292,69 +292,115 @@ static int acpi_power_off_device(acpi_ha
return 0;
}
+/**
+ * acpi_device_sleep_wake - execute _DSW (Device Sleep Wake) or (deprecated in
+ * ACPI 3.0) _PSW (Power State Wake)
+ * @dev: Device to handle.
+ * @enable: 0 - disable, 1 - enable the wake capabilities of the device.
+ * @sleep_state: Target sleep state of the system.
+ * @dev_state: Target power state of the device.
+ *
+ * Execute _DSW (Device Sleep Wake) or (deprecated in ACPI 3.0) _PSW (Power
+ * State Wake) for the device, if present. On failure reset the device's
+ * wakeup.flags.valid flag.
+ *
+ * RETURN VALUE:
+ * 0 if either _DSW or _PSW has been successfully executed
+ * 0 if neither _DSW nor _PSW has been found
+ * -ENODEV if the execution of either _DSW or _PSW has failed
+ */
+int acpi_device_sleep_wake(struct acpi_device *dev,
+ int enable, int sleep_state, int dev_state)
+{
+ union acpi_object in_arg[3];
+ struct acpi_object_list arg_list = { 3, in_arg };
+ acpi_status status = AE_OK;
+
+ /*
+ * Try to execute _DSW first.
+ *
+ * Three agruments are needed for the _DSW object:
+ * Argument 0: enable/disable the wake capabilities
+ * Argument 1: target system state
+ * Argument 2: target device state
+ * When _DSW object is called to disable the wake capabilities, maybe
+ * the first argument is filled. The values of the other two agruments
+ * are meaningless.
+ */
+ in_arg[0].type = ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER;
+ in_arg[0].integer.value = enable;
+ in_arg[1].type = ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER;
+ in_arg[1].integer.value = sleep_state;
+ in_arg[2].type = ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER;
+ in_arg[2].integer.value = dev_state;
+ status = acpi_evaluate_object(dev->handle, "_DSW", &arg_list, NULL);
+ if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) {
+ return 0;
+ } else if (status != AE_NOT_FOUND) {
+ printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX "_DSW execution failed\n");
+ dev->wakeup.flags.valid = 0;
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
+
+ /* Execute _PSW */
+ arg_list.count = 1;
+ in_arg[0].integer.value = enable;
+ status = acpi_evaluate_object(dev->handle, "_PSW", &arg_list, NULL);
+ if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) && (status != AE_NOT_FOUND)) {
+ printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX "_PSW execution failed\n");
+ dev->wakeup.flags.valid = 0;
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
/*
* Prepare a wakeup device, two steps (Ref ACPI 2.0:P229):
* 1. Power on the power resources required for the wakeup device
- * 2. Enable _PSW (power state wake) for the device if present
+ * 2. Execute _DSW (Device Sleep Wake) or (deprecated in ACPI 3.0) _PSW (Power
+ * State Wake) for the device, if present
*/
-int acpi_enable_wakeup_device_power(struct acpi_device *dev)
+int acpi_enable_wakeup_device_power(struct acpi_device *dev, int sleep_state)
{
- union acpi_object arg = { ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER };
- struct acpi_object_list arg_list = { 1, &arg };
- acpi_status status = AE_OK;
int i;
- int ret = 0;
if (!dev || !dev->wakeup.flags.valid)
- return -1;
+ return -EINVAL;
- arg.integer.value = 1;
/* Open power resource */
for (i = 0; i < dev->wakeup.resources.count; i++) {
- ret = acpi_power_on(dev->wakeup.resources.handles[i], dev);
+ int ret = acpi_power_on(dev->wakeup.resources.handles[i], dev);
if (ret) {
printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX "Transition power state\n");
dev->wakeup.flags.valid = 0;
- return -1;
+ return -ENODEV;
}
}
- /* Execute PSW */
- status = acpi_evaluate_object(dev->handle, "_PSW", &arg_list, NULL);
- if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) && (status != AE_NOT_FOUND)) {
- printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX "Evaluate _PSW\n");
- dev->wakeup.flags.valid = 0;
- ret = -1;
- }
-
- return ret;
+ /*
+ * Passing 3 as the third argument below means the device may be placed
+ * in arbitrary power state afterwards.
+ */
+ return acpi_device_sleep_wake(dev, 1, sleep_state, 3);
}
/*
* Shutdown a wakeup device, counterpart of above method
- * 1. Disable _PSW (power state wake)
+ * 1. Execute _DSW (Device Sleep Wake) or (deprecated in ACPI 3.0) _PSW (Power
+ * State Wake) for the device, if present
* 2. Shutdown down the power resources
*/
int acpi_disable_wakeup_device_power(struct acpi_device *dev)
{
- union acpi_object arg = { ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER };
- struct acpi_object_list arg_list = { 1, &arg };
- acpi_status status = AE_OK;
- int i;
- int ret = 0;
-
+ int i, ret;
if (!dev || !dev->wakeup.flags.valid)
- return -1;
+ return -EINVAL;
- arg.integer.value = 0;
- /* Execute PSW */
- status = acpi_evaluate_object(dev->handle, "_PSW", &arg_list, NULL);
- if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) && (status != AE_NOT_FOUND)) {
- printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX "Evaluate _PSW\n");
- dev->wakeup.flags.valid = 0;
- return -1;
- }
+ ret = acpi_device_sleep_wake(dev, 0, 0, 0);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
/* Close power resource */
for (i = 0; i < dev->wakeup.resources.count; i++) {
@@ -362,7 +408,7 @@ int acpi_disable_wakeup_device_power(str
if (ret) {
printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX "Transition power state\n");
dev->wakeup.flags.valid = 0;
- return -1;
+ return -ENODEV;
}
}
Index: linux-next/drivers/acpi/sleep/wakeup.c
===================================================================
--- linux-next.orig/drivers/acpi/sleep/wakeup.c
+++ linux-next/drivers/acpi/sleep/wakeup.c
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ void acpi_enable_wakeup_device_prep(u8 s
continue;
spin_unlock(&acpi_device_lock);
- acpi_enable_wakeup_device_power(dev);
+ acpi_enable_wakeup_device_power(dev, sleep_state);
spin_lock(&acpi_device_lock);
}
spin_unlock(&acpi_device_lock);
Index: linux-next/include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h
===================================================================
--- linux-next.orig/include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h
+++ linux-next/include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h
@@ -87,7 +87,9 @@ struct pci_bus *pci_acpi_scan_root(struc
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- */
#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_POWER
-int acpi_enable_wakeup_device_power(struct acpi_device *dev);
+int acpi_device_sleep_wake(struct acpi_device *dev,
+ int enable, int sleep_state, int dev_state);
+int acpi_enable_wakeup_device_power(struct acpi_device *dev, int sleep_state);
int acpi_disable_wakeup_device_power(struct acpi_device *dev);
int acpi_power_get_inferred_state(struct acpi_device *device);
int acpi_power_transition(struct acpi_device *device, int state);
Index: linux-next/drivers/acpi/scan.c
===================================================================
--- linux-next.orig/drivers/acpi/scan.c
+++ linux-next/drivers/acpi/scan.c
@@ -703,9 +703,7 @@ static int acpi_bus_get_wakeup_device_fl
acpi_status status = 0;
struct acpi_buffer buffer = { ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER, NULL };
union acpi_object *package = NULL;
- union acpi_object in_arg[3];
- struct acpi_object_list arg_list = { 3, in_arg };
- acpi_status psw_status = AE_OK;
+ int psw_error;
struct acpi_device_id button_device_ids[] = {
{"PNP0C0D", 0},
@@ -737,39 +735,11 @@ static int acpi_bus_get_wakeup_device_fl
* So it is necessary to call _DSW object first. Only when it is not
* present will the _PSW object used.
*/
- /*
- * Three agruments are needed for the _DSW object.
- * Argument 0: enable/disable the wake capabilities
- * When _DSW object is called to disable the wake capabilities, maybe
- * the first argument is filled. The value of the other two agruments
- * is meaningless.
- */
- in_arg[0].type = ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER;
- in_arg[0].integer.value = 0;
- in_arg[1].type = ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER;
- in_arg[1].integer.value = 0;
- in_arg[2].type = ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER;
- in_arg[2].integer.value = 0;
- psw_status = acpi_evaluate_object(device->handle, "_DSW",
- &arg_list, NULL);
- if (ACPI_FAILURE(psw_status) && (psw_status != AE_NOT_FOUND))
- ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO, "error in evaluate _DSW\n"));
- /*
- * When the _DSW object is not present, OSPM will call _PSW object.
- */
- if (psw_status == AE_NOT_FOUND) {
- /*
- * Only one agruments is required for the _PSW object.
- * agrument 0: enable/disable the wake capabilities
- */
- arg_list.count = 1;
- in_arg[0].integer.value = 0;
- psw_status = acpi_evaluate_object(device->handle, "_PSW",
- &arg_list, NULL);
- if (ACPI_FAILURE(psw_status) && (psw_status != AE_NOT_FOUND))
- ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO, "error in "
- "evaluate _PSW\n"));
- }
+ psw_error = acpi_device_sleep_wake(device, 0, 0, 0);
+ if (psw_error)
+ ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO,
+ "error in _DSW or _PSW evaluation\n"));
+
/* Power button, Lid switch always enable wakeup */
if (!acpi_match_device_ids(device, button_device_ids))
device->wakeup.flags.run_wake = 1;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-01 22:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-01 21:56 [PATCH 0/9] PCI PM: Handling of PCI devices wake-up functionality (rev. 3) Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-07-01 22:00 ` [PATCH 1/9] PCI ACPI: Remove acpi_platform_enable_wakeup Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-07-01 22:03 ` [PATCH 2/9] ACPI: Introduce acpi_bus_power_manageable function Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-07-01 22:04 ` [PATCH 3/9] PCI: Introduce platform_pci_power_manageable function Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-07-01 22:05 ` [PATCH 4/9] PCI: Rework pci_set_power_state function (rev. 3) Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-07-01 22:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2008-07-01 22:07 ` [PATCH 6/9] ACPI: Introduce new device wakeup flag 'prepared' Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-07-01 22:08 ` [PATCH 7/9] PCI ACPI: Rework PCI handling of wake-up (rev. 4) Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-07-02 7:30 ` Zhao Yakui
2008-07-02 10:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-07-01 22:09 ` [PATCH 8/9] PCI PM: Introduce pci_prepare_to_sleep and pci_back_from_sleep Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-07-01 22:10 ` [PATCH 9/9] PCI: Simplify PCI device PM code (rev. 4) Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-07-03 12:04 ` [PATCH 0/9] PCI PM: Handling of PCI devices wake-up functionality (rev. 3) Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-07-07 1:30 ` [PATCH 0/8] PCI PM: Handling of PCI devices wake-up functionality (rev. 4) Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-07-07 1:30 ` [PATCH 1/8] ACPI: Introduce acpi_bus_power_manageable function Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-07-07 1:32 ` [PATCH 2/8] PCI: Introduce platform_pci_power_manageable function Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-07-07 1:32 ` [PATCH 3/8] PCI: Rework pci_set_power_state function (rev. 4) Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-07-07 1:33 ` [PATCH 4/8] ACPI: Introduce acpi_device_sleep_wake function Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-07-07 1:34 ` [PATCH 5/8] ACPI: Introduce new device wakeup flag 'prepared' Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-07-07 14:08 ` Pavel Machek
2008-07-07 1:34 ` [PATCH 6/8] PCI ACPI: Rework PCI handling of wake-up (rev. 5) Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-07-11 20:30 ` Pavel Machek
2008-07-07 1:35 ` [PATCH 7/8] PCI PM: Introduce pci_prepare_to_sleep and pci_back_from_sleep Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-07-11 20:31 ` Pavel Machek
2008-07-07 1:36 ` [PATCH 8/8] PCI: Simplify PCI device PM code (rev. 4) Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-07-11 20:37 ` Pavel Machek
2008-07-11 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-07-11 20:49 ` Pavel Machek
2008-07-08 0:49 ` [PATCH 0/8] PCI PM: Handling of PCI devices wake-up functionality " Jesse Barnes
2008-07-08 14:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-07-13 20:45 ` PCI PM: Fix pci_prepare_to_sleep Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-07-14 21:27 ` Jesse Barnes
2008-07-14 21:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200807020006.52838.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=yakui.zhao@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).