From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Garrett Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ACPI Video: Ignore devices that aren't present in hardware Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 17:16:43 +0100 Message-ID: <20080703161643.GB29110@srcf.ucam.org> References: <200807031805.52883.trenn@suse.de> <20080703160822.GA29110@srcf.ucam.org> <200807031815.13291.trenn@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([93.93.128.6]:59723 "EHLO vavatch.codon.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751058AbYGCQQq (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Jul 2008 12:16:46 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200807031815.13291.trenn@suse.de> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Thomas Renninger Cc: ak@linux.intel.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Julia Jomantaite , marcus@better.se, dannybaumann@web.de, corsac@debian.org On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 06:15:11PM +0200, Thomas Renninger wrote: > On Thursday 03 July 2008 18:08:22 Matthew Garrett wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 06:05:51PM +0200, Thomas Renninger wrote: > > > Can these two go to linux-next or -mm, pls. > > > > Not until the opregion code is merged, no. > Why? Because it's entirely plausible that it'll break existing systems. > Try the next patch, it works for the T61. > These IGD parts could take quite a while still, while Toshibas and others > remain broken (and T61 poke on wrong hardware which could cause > all kind of badness). The code's written and works, it just has a 750ms latency for reasons I don't understand. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org